alt.binaries.erotica.nospam.creampiePrev. Next
Re: Douche bag spammer and !Ping ChinaFan
ChinaFan (ChinaFan@invalid.invalid) 2015/02/23 20:38

Path: news.nzbot.com!news.astraweb.com!border6.newsrouter.astraweb.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 21:38:57 -0600
From: ChinaFan <ChinaFan@invalid.invalid>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.erotica.nospam.creampie
Subject: Re: Douche bag spammer and !Ping ChinaFan
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 19:38:57 -0800
Message-ID: <knrnealja41e1lurocrlasj3fka5b3rr2q@4ax.com>
References: <vwQFw.729870$ZT5.104369@fx07.iad> <mf2gealtgvn26bgmj75456i6vojebfo49g@4ax.com> <ealgealk01fquj8nllj8fmmsljeqa3csiu@4ax.com> <fkgmeadfnmnrb43l7kq4amjlr7uoul0blv@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 5.00/32.1171
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 44
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-MsDzRksWJbrtqfPmEA9LQ2KZ4hdDXpMiQ9yoKtKas43AQBfq9lVLlW6MgUmH2jWo0J0Y3KaFu26kEU9!igyEGcNg3o6oNwvZ5m7XhZmzYOIK5DLimXCb4vyt2EQcR1YxEvOEIn0SKy40xsHFg08s
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 2554
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.erotica.nospam.creampie:463

On Mon, 23 Feb 2015 09:12:01 -0600, C_Ya <cum-one@cum-all.edu> wrote:

>On Sat, 21 Feb 2015 03:53:18 -0600, C_Ya <cum-one@cum-all.edu> wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 20 Feb 2015 20:31:15 -0800, ChinaFan
>><ChinaFan@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, 20 Feb 2015 19:43:11 -0500, DocPapsm <stinkfinger@ou812.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>Anybody have an Agent filter for this douche?
>>>
>>>Here ya go:
>>>
>>>Message-ID:
>>>=%{<[0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f]\.[0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f]?[0-9a-f]?[0-9a-f]?\.[0-9a-f][0-9a-f]?[0-9a-f]?@[a-z][a-z][a-z][a-z][a-z]\.com>}
>>
>>
>>Luv the filter, but which douche bag spammer ?
>>
>>Not seeing it I guess.
>>
>>Thanks cf, you are the best filter writer. Evah !
>
>
>After further review, know which douche you mean.
>
>ChinaFan:  WoW, that filter is a thing of beauty !
>      Well done, and thank you immensely !
>
>OK with you if I share the filter ?

Hi, C_Ya.

Be my guest.  Posted an earlier version (not quite as comprehensive)
to abme.asian a month or so ago.  Even this one might be not quite
complete; could let appx 16 messages through out of each million or
so.  To fix, insert one more question mark ("?") between the 6th
(sixth) and 7th (seventh) "[0-9a-f]"s; this change would filter out
also those message ids that have only 1 (one) hex digit in the second
dotted component.

--
cf

Follow-ups:123
Next Prev. Article List         Favorite