On Mon, 21 Jul 2014 11:39:27 -0500, Cream-Ya <cum-one@cum-all.edu>
wrote:
>On Sat, 19 Jul 2014 17:41:53 -0400, elder-bookworm <nobody@noone.net>
>wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 17 Jul 2014 11:04:10 -0500, Cream-Ya <cum-one@cum-all.edu>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 17 Jul 2014 15:40:50 GMT, "dr. who?" <noemail@none.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Cream-Ya <cum-one@cum-all.edu> wrote in
>>>>news:aidds9hncfvt0035k267hcsa5i20f7lvtn@4ax.com:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Do you think the tweak-news spammers have any idea how easy it is to
>>>>> filter their posts ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Nah, prolly not. Spammers not too bright ! B^]]
>>>>>
>>>>> Anybody know how they recruit these dweebs ?
>>>>> Trying to generate traffic to sites for pay ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Jes wunnerin'
>>>>
>>>>it's not how smart or dumb they are, it is the idiots that support them
>>>>that they count on.
>>>
>>>
>>>As usenet has been phased out of many ISPs and most 'users'
>>>have gone to premium servers, one has to wonder how many
>>>newbies these spams entice to sign up for www access.
>>>
>>>Is it the purveyors themselves, or the affiliates who generate these
>>>spams in the hopes of generating paying customers ?
>>One thought...such as it is...lol
>>
>>When I first signed up for my usenet provider I was NOT allowed to
>>post ANYTHING. I could download what I pleased but I had to wait 3
>>months before I was allowed to even REPLY to a poster with a "thanks".
>>
>>Am wondering how many usenet providers do the same?
>>
>>Jes wunnerin' also...
>
>
>That's curious.
>
>Have beeen with the same premium news provider for over 10 yrs.
>there was no such rule in place then.
>
>Got a link to the TOS/AUP ?
New EN account posting default is OFF...until ya asks 'em nicely. Even
then you are limited to 200 posts a day, unless ya asks 'em pretty
please...
|
|