On Sat, 19 Jul 2014 17:41:53 -0400, elder-bookworm <nobody@noone.net>
wrote:
>On Thu, 17 Jul 2014 11:04:10 -0500, Cream-Ya <cum-one@cum-all.edu>
>wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 17 Jul 2014 15:40:50 GMT, "dr. who?" <noemail@none.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Cream-Ya <cum-one@cum-all.edu> wrote in
>>>news:aidds9hncfvt0035k267hcsa5i20f7lvtn@4ax.com:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Do you think the tweak-news spammers have any idea how easy it is to
>>>> filter their posts ?
>>>>
>>>> Nah, prolly not. Spammers not too bright ! B^]]
>>>>
>>>> Anybody know how they recruit these dweebs ?
>>>> Trying to generate traffic to sites for pay ?
>>>>
>>>> Jes wunnerin'
>>>
>>>it's not how smart or dumb they are, it is the idiots that support them
>>>that they count on.
>>
>>
>>As usenet has been phased out of many ISPs and most 'users'
>>have gone to premium servers, one has to wonder how many
>>newbies these spams entice to sign up for www access.
>>
>>Is it the purveyors themselves, or the affiliates who generate these
>>spams in the hopes of generating paying customers ?
>One thought...such as it is...lol
>
>When I first signed up for my usenet provider I was NOT allowed to
>post ANYTHING. I could download what I pleased but I had to wait 3
>months before I was allowed to even REPLY to a poster with a "thanks".
>
>Am wondering how many usenet providers do the same?
>
>Jes wunnerin' also...
That's curious.
Have beeen with the same premium news provider for over 10 yrs.
there was no such rule in place then.
Got a link to the TOS/AUP ?
|
|