Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.e-books:13243
Path: news.nzbot.com!peer03.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer03.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer03.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx32.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.e-books
Subject: Re: ATTN: Pstman Pat <pat@hello.com> Please use REQ: instead of WTD:
From: Postman Pat <Pat@hello.com>
References: <QEh%E.111625$8s2.54595@fx40.iad>
Organization: Your Company
Message-ID: <XnsAA9BD4AE7AFEEPat@69.16.179.59>
User-Agent: Xnews/2009.05.01
Lines: 14
X-Complaints-To: http://abuse.usenetxs.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2019 19:54:26 UTC
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2019 19:54:26 GMT
X-Received-Bytes: 1059
X-Received-Body-CRC: 3117525110
root <root@null.com> wrote in news:QEh%E.111625$8s2.54595@fx40.iad:
> Please use REQ: instead of WTD:
> That's the norm for Usenet and what is expected. Most users filter
> unwanted traffic and using REQ: allows those that don't fill requests to
> niot see your post. It's just polite to stick with convention. Thanks
> for being part of the group. --Root
>
>
>
Roger wilco.
Thanks
|
|