On Sun, 26 May 2019 20:12:45 GMT, eReader <no-reply@no-mail.com>
wrote:
>browser<zero@invalid.org> wrote in news:mbslee19fm10uv7hrbvdqohp95cce8saru@
>4ax.com:
>
>> Thank you for your consideration! I only wish PG projects were
>> formated more elegantly and up-to-date!
>>
>
>There was another version but it's quality was far worse. Some were just
>scanned (photo) pages and were almost unreadable.
>
>---
It's hard to beat a commercial publisher! Of course, you can always
code a PG file yourself if it's that important.
|
|