On Mon, 6 Oct 2014 17:36:25 +0100, "Ian Field" <gangprobing.alien@ntlworld.com>
wrote:
>
>
>"Charles Lindbergh" <spirit@stlouis.invalid> wrote in message
>news:s8a33ah9ta5b2fqqf0bmfjar7fb4foj03c@4ax.com...
>> On Sun, 5 Oct 2014 21:14:09 +0100, "Ian Field"
>> <gangprobing.alien@ntlworld.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>"Charles Lindbergh" <spirit@stlouis.invalid> wrote in message
>>>news:56733adel7cii0race2gqfgp9786in34k5@4ax.com...
>>>> On Sun, 05 Oct 2014 14:51:57 GMT, Moi <moi@here.now> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Why in tech e-book? Easy, they're taking the first falering steps
>>>>>>>towards knowledge. If they search this forum in the past and
>>>>>>>themselves'll find plenty of information to educate theirself.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Anybody who uses phrases like 'socialist vultures' "spending other
>>>>>>>peoples' money" are just advertising their complete ignorance of basic
>>>>>>>socio-economic political philosophy.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Or to put into language that they can understand, they're dumb fucks
>>>>>>>or
>>>>>>>know nothing about politics - so why should anybody listen when they
>>>>>>>rabbit on about politics.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Good argument, you disagree with my position so I don't know anything
>>>>>> about politics. Really, is that the very best you can do?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Saul Alinsky would be proud of you.
>>>>>
>>>>>I can't disagree with your position because you haven't presented one,
>>>>>merely a sentence deenigrating a position thqat you are ignorant of.
>>>>>
>>>>>Have you ever seen the IT Crowd? The one where the woman who is totally
>>>>>ignorany of IT repeats what her staff have told her, in a managers
>>>>>meeting, that if you type 'google' into google you will 'break the
>>>>>internet'. She was just displaying her ignorance of what she was talking
>>>>>about.
>>>>>
>>>>>If you knew anything about basic socio-economic political theory (I
>>>>>include capitalism in this heading) you wouldn't use such terms, you'd
>>>>>be
>>>>>in a position to present an informed opinion.
>>>>>
>>>>>Comments such as 'socialist vultures' and 'spending other peoples'
>>>>>money'
>>>>>are the equivalent to "if you type 'google' into google you'll break the
>>>>>internet.
>>>>
>>>> I have been giving your comments some consideration. You are right
>>>> about
>>>> one
>>>> thing, socialists are not carrion scavengers. Socialists are worse than
>>>> scavengers, they are parasites, more closely related to ticks, fleas and
>>>> tapeworms.
>>>>
>>>> At least vultures do the work of finding an organism which is finished
>>>> using
>>>> it's assets.
>>>
>>>In the UK; we have the Toraidhe, who decide that publicly owned assets
>>>actually belong to them while they're in government - and sell them off to
>>>foreign investors.
>>
>>
>> It is quite apparent you do not like the conservative party in the UK.
>>
>> If someone has done something illegal, they should be prosecuted. On the
>> other
>> hand, if you simply disagree with their policies, vote them out of office.
>>
>> If you can't vote them out of office, well, you are shit-out-of-luck.
>>
>> By the way, exactly what "publicly owned assets" were sold off
>> inappropriately?
>
>It would be quicker to list the family silver that they haven't flogged off!
>
>British Rail, British Telecom (GPO) and the national grid spring to mind
>without much thought.
>
>I'm not too sure who actually owned our car manufacturers, but I can't think
>of any that remain in British ownership since the previous infestation of
>thieving Toraidhe.
I do not believe any government should be in the business of competing with
private enterprise. As a result, the separation of BT from the post office and
the privatization of British Rail were appropriate.
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 |
| 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | 77 | 78 | 79 |
|