On Mon, 06 Oct 2014 12:11:24 GMT, Moi <moi@here.now> wrote:
>On Sun, 05 Oct 2014 19:44:38 +0000, Charles Lindbergh wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 05 Oct 2014 14:51:57 GMT, Moi <moi@here.now> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>Comments such as 'socialist vultures' and 'spending other peoples'
>>>money'
>>>are the equivalent to "if you type 'google' into google you'll break the
>>>internet.
>>
>> I have been giving your comments some consideration. You are right
>> about one thing, socialists are not carrion scavengers. Socialists are
>> worse than scavengers, they are parasites, more closely related to
>> ticks, fleas and tapeworms.
>>
>> At least vultures do the work of finding an organism which is finished
>> using it's assets. Parasites, a.k.a. socialists, do no work, they invade
>> any thriving organism, siphoning off life sustaining nutrients rendering
>> the host frail, diseased or at the very least, worse off than it would
>> have been without the parasite, a.k.a. socialist.
>>
>> Yes, socialists are parasites and should be treated as such.
>
>Q.E.D.
ROTFLMAO! :-)
Curious how you are unable to refute my assertions with any substantive
arguments.
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 |
| 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | 77 | 78 | 79 |
|