On Fri, 03 Oct 2014 22:32:19 +0000, Charles Lindbergh <spirit@stlouis.invalid>
wrote:
>On Fri, 3 Oct 2014 23:01:17 +0100, one@two.three wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 3 Oct 2014 20:52:02 +0100, Charles Lindbergh wrote
>>(in article <ohvt2ahjt68hfp335ibk19h4qgt4vnbmug@4ax.com>):
>>
>>> On Fri, 3 Oct 2014 19:39:30 +0100, "Ian Field"
>>> <gangprobing.alien@ntlworld.com>
>>> wrote:
>>
>>>>> In what way is your post related to technical e-books?
>>>>>
>>>>> Inquiring minds want to know.
>>>>
>>>> We can't afford any under Tory imposed austerity.
>>>
>>> Must suck when you can't spend other peoples money..........
>>
>>Are you implying that Ian's a banker?
>>
>>If he is, he can be reassured that Cameron, his cronies and their equivalents
>>in the rest of the world will continue to shovel other people's money at
>>them, both directly and indirectly. They know better than to bite the lying,
>>cheating, defrauding, thieving hands that feed them.
>>
>>I realise this isn't an answer to the question 'why is this in tech e-books'
>>but, hey, this is usenet.
>
>Sounds like a couple of socialist vultures who resent not being able to get
>their beaks into the carcasses of the British taxpayers.
If only the U.S. was like the UK. We are trying to move toward that though. God
bless Obama Care.
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 |
| 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | 77 | 78 | 79 |
|