Path: news.nzbot.com!news.astraweb.com!border6.newsrouter.astraweb.com!newspeer1.nac.net!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2015 23:04:09 -0600
From: Vreejack <homeless.beggar@internet.crossroads.usa>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.e-book.rpg
Subject: Re: TSR Initiative - Dungeon Masters Guide (revised) - "Dungeon Master's Guide (1E Revised).pdf" (000/155) 45.7 MBytes yEnc
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2015 00:04:02 -0500
Message-ID: <mpd98b91grbfgrhiuj8jr6r1f7oqa077ho@4ax.com>
References: <oec08bd6i9t1lti85a1rcc2mqglsks3i58@4ax.com> <h1m18bd035vpv3bc8hgi2f0k8rpjs6i7hu@4ax.com> <d9h28blrnqapa5k38cp1v0kn2k9t0j9ph3@4ax.com>
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 31
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-bJZaaSjNWFP6oOprEaRgGBp8kgqNcmXskYIOkjbee7VOL7QPU2lME0F3Z/S6i6H05htUphLWy/eBqXk!Ucy/gyTOUq9Z2D1c/RjoJj9BL1MFTTIoOTjU6y2mnJB8Ltt6oKJ/X5tmp588NBuxLJPgWw==
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 2531
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.e-book.rpg:693
On Mon, 28 Dec 2015 09:23:47 -0500, Spanky The Man
<SpankyTheMan@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Mon, 28 Dec 2015 01:40:27 -0500, Vreejack
><homeless.beggar@internet.crossroads.usa> wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 27 Dec 2015 13:45:59 -0500, Spanky The Man
>><SpankyTheMan@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Like the Players Handbook, the Dungeon Masters Guide received an
>>>update, with the most prominent change being the revised cover art and
>>>orange binding so it matched the format of the other AD&D hardbacks.
>>>The content inside was almost identical otherwise.
>
>>I got suspicious because the scanned pages showed too much age. I also
>>remembered that a few years ago someone posted this scan without the
>>bookmarks and explained that he just changed the cover on an old scan.
>>This is it.
>
>That was me, and it was seven months ago. ;-)
>
>IIRC, I also replaced one or two pages (near the back I think) as
>well. It is not 100% identical.
>
>Determining printing versions is difficult with early TSR hardcovers,
>since they mixed-n-matched covers and content when they started
>running short of the one or the other. The 8th printing had the new
>cover but its frontspiece still referred to the original cover and
>artist. This was fixed in the 9th printing.
You archivist, you.
|
|