On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 20:22:08 -0800, Solly <rlSolly@REMOVEshaw.ca>
wrote:
>Chuck99 <chuck99@fakemail.net> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 22:42:56 GMT, Robert Landsparger <rhell@mtu.edu>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 03:59:44 +0000, Chuck99 wrote:
>>>
>>>Why is the screen all jacked up? Its like a reverse letterbox. the
>>>vertical exaggeration is way off.
>>
>>Aparently I don't see what you're seeing. I capture at 720 x 480 to
>>MPEG1/2 using WinDVD from Intervideo and generate the DVD with it as
>>well. On my system it plays at 640 x 480 - dunno why. I'm fairly
>>sure the WinDVD is a 'lite' version; the editor functions are
>>rudmentary and that's being generous. This was my 6th or 7th VHS2DVD
>>conversion and they're all the same. So are all the reposts from
>>sitkaman I've downloaded. Is this the only one of my posts that you
>>see as screwed up?
>>
>>Thanks for your comments but I don't know what I can do about it.
>>
>>Regards,
>>
>>chuck99
>Looks normal to me. 640 is standard for A/R of 4:3. You get 720 if it is
>16:9. Has the VHS bottom artifacts but you need better editing software to
>get rid of that. I notice that even many commercial DVDs have that problem.
re:better editor - Fer shur! I might even get one someday!
Pity that Virtualdub wasn't designed to do mpgs, it's got a great
editor.
chuck99
|
|