Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: Solly <rlSolly@REMOVEshaw.ca>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.dvd.erotica.classics
Subject: Re: Young and Innocent-1987-Young and Innocent NFO.nfo
Organization: None
Message-ID: <s5lo8bhrepj8j5n5dcbqavvb7mr77bsuf6@4ax.com>
References: <mrpl8b975idagb2j7o6qkaoeii6kdd1sck@4ax.com> <KzDiy.90479$_r1.67075@fx24.iad>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 6.00/32.1186
X-No-Archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 12
NNTP-Posting-Host: 50.67.48.205
X-Complaints-To: internet.abuse@sjrb.ca
X-Trace: 1452037690 50.67.48.205 (Tue, 05 Jan 2016 23:48:10 UTC)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2016 23:48:10 UTC
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2016 15:48:03 -0800
X-Received-Body-CRC: 1063571607
X-Received-Bytes: 1583
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.dvd.erotica.classics:2685
Mace <Mace@Mace.net> wrote:
>Well, if they can't tell the difference by looking at the dates 1981 vs 1987 or reading the NFO files and
>comparing the casts. They can always ask if it was a different movie from the one previously posted. When I
>started out, I asked a lot of questions to a lot of the great contributors of the time and all my questions
>were answered. We are all eager to share what knowledge we possess. That's the only way we can keep this
>thing going
Sorry if I offended you. I did not mean my comment to be a criticism. I
appreciate all your posts.
--
Solly (remove the REMOVE to E-mail me)
|
|