Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.dvd.erotica.classics
Subject: Re: Repost of abdec post #490 Femme Objet _sitkaman repost.txt posted by Doctor Who on May 31, 2005 (1/1)
From: mjello <non.compos@ment.is>
References: <xsydncO218RWUufLnZ2dnUVZ5v0AAAAA@giganews.com> <XnsA5796C06BF84Ctrastrastras@69.16.179.26> <kdvn7b9s1p9jokp5s5ssvnadk4alag609l@4ax.com>
Organization: wing.prayer
Message-ID: <XnsA57A49849EB1Ctrastrastras@69.16.179.27>
User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 151224-1, 12/24/2015), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Lines: 23
X-Complaints-To: abuse@usenetserver.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2015 15:13:26 UTC
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2015 15:13:26 GMT
X-Received-Body-CRC: 310617746
X-Received-Bytes: 1838
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.dvd.erotica.classics:2606
sitkaman wrote in news:kdvn7b9s1p9jokp5s5ssvnadk4alag609l@4ax.com:
> And yes, I forgot to mention that the original name on the Doctor Who
> post was the Caballero rename of "Programmed For Pleasure". Maybe I
> should not have renamed it, but it seems simpler to use only the
> original name for various versions of a movie.
Ahh, crap.
My bad.
I failed to look for aka's in your list.
As for name/rename, you can't win for losing. People as dense as I am will
get confused no matter which you choose.
Are there really differences between the two (meaning the movie itself)?
PFP 3,201MB 1:25:53
FO 4,291MB 1:22:17
or are the differences just a function of the authoring?
I certainly don't expect you/anybody to do a side-by-side compare,
but maybe there's a reviewer comment somewhere about cuts....
|
|