| Re: Repost of abdec post #490 Femme Objet _sitkaman repost.txt posted by Doctor Who on May 31, 2005 (1/1) |
|
| () |
2015/12/24 07:19 |
Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2015 08:19:18 -0600
From: sitkaman
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.dvd.erotica.classics
Subject: Re: Repost of abdec post #490 Femme Objet _sitkaman repost.txt posted by Doctor Who on May 31, 2005 (1/1)
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2015 08:19:19 -0600
Message-ID: <kdvn7b9s1p9jokp5s5ssvnadk4alag609l@4ax.com>
References: <xsydncO218RWUufLnZ2dnUVZ5v0AAAAA@giganews.com> <XnsA5796C06BF84Ctrastrastras@69.16.179.26>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 6.00/32.1186
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 23
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-C1laGx6Tp17hO3cAZOV6CybZMj2mYg9jczez5S4AHlJ8LFD3cwsxA5HGvQXO3/vZjvf/u7fkxI0pKhi!8LzGOowTxzrOGRels/OzfpzvUAf99Mbip0oK3cRIbkLWH4VZHNfQv7Q7eZa6qekdFWE=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 2120
X-Received-Body-CRC: 55901223
X-Received-Bytes: 2371
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.dvd.erotica.classics:2603
On Wed, 23 Dec 2015 18:37:01 GMT, mjello <non.compos@ment.is> wrote:
>sitkaman@nospam.com (sitkaman) wrote in
>news:xsydncO218RWUufLnZ2dnUVZ5v0AAAAA@giganews.com:
>
>> I don't have any of the original NFO or cover files that
>> might have posted with this film.
>
>...on the assumption that you won't be reposting the DodgeDart version
>because it's the Burly version (but maybe not this version - your list
>isn't showing a Doctor Who version of "Femme Objet" and both the runtime
>and the filesize are different), here's the DodgeDart nfo (and a bonus
>Gfox_2000 bio I downloaded at about that same time)...
>
Yes the DodgeDart version is a repost of the Burly post.
And yes, I forgot to mention that the original name on the Doctor Who post was the
Caballero rename of "Programmed For Pleasure". Maybe I should not have renamed it, but it
seems simpler to use only the original name for various versions of a movie.
But I'm probably wrong...
|
|
|