Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.dvd.erotica.classics
Subject: Re: Lucretia Sarah Young 1997.par2 (1/1)
From: "J.J. Flash" <yas@yas.yas>
References: <9IX3y.212068$C67.168977@fx02.iad>
Organization: Get Yer Ya-Ya's Out!
Message-ID: <XnsA5593E32D18D2CRS@69.16.179.26>
User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 151121-0, 11/21/2015), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Lines: 20
X-Complaints-To: abuse@usenetserver.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2015 14:06:37 UTC
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2015 14:06:37 GMT
X-Received-Body-CRC: 2838256742
X-Received-Bytes: 1519
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.dvd.erotica.classics:2444
Yenc@power-post.org (copernic87) wrote in news:9IX3y.212068$C67.168977
@fx02.iad:
> Lucretia Sarah Young 1997
No. Off-topic, like the rest.
[from the abdec FAQ]
Q: What is considered as Erotica Classics?
A: With few exceptions, we consider only films from the so-called "Golden
Age" of porn to be classics. These are films that were produced in the
1970s and 1980s, which would be reviewed and referred to by such authors as
Jim Holiday, Robert Rimmer, Patrick Riley and others. They are films of
broad appeal to porn aficionados of those years, and would not include
niche films, cult films, gonzo films or other films of more narrow appeal,
which would more appropriately be posted to other groups that cater to such
films.
|
|