Path: news.nzbot.com!news.astraweb.com!border6.newsrouter.astraweb.com!newspeer1.nac.net!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 23:46:57 -0600
From: sitkaman
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.dvd.erotica.classics
Subject: Re: Repost of a.b.d.e.c. post #196 Baby Face 2 _sitkaman repost.txt posted by Chicken on Sep 4, 2004 (1/1) - "Concerning_Recovery_Files.png" (0/1) 18.6 kBytes yEnc
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 23:47:02 -0600
Message-ID: <aqkebadujkcrc7ai2mo6l6ep88g09fci0u@4ax.com>
References: <t8idnXPfT54bUTPJnZ2dnUU7-SMAAAAA@giganews.com> <oluvaadehpehd3ab1dk8j1sjnr0hrm0uep@4ax.com> <sv62balq8erdemjp0u7qvgoq98adqlpr0e@4ax.com> <qvkaba16ph6tkordrpg6mcofqnbqp7d27c@4ax.com> <acdbba1hv8ehfqmetrrt1d1voll7ghu75q@4ax.com> <3m5cba56jp83vv9mg5fm2r2s8u3b9407h5@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 6.00/32.1186
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 82
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-6CiMmRL8gZ3l4mTWHcwe/ECCX3niyVvt1wTsirGxFY9G0w3A0DZ0shHdcdUaVe9sn1Lw0UNFOP5uWYq!5ArvM+ze873X5+TpL4VAhkQX4WNaKY66YQyB1ZTVX/KLzr0EP67rTU92dWJJmu6vU4s=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 4669
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.dvd.erotica.classics:1139
On Wed, 14 Jan 2015 08:17:33 +0100, J. Knasterhuis <j.knasterhuis@localhost> wrote:
>On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 16:33:34 -0800, Solly <solly1@REMOVEnewsguy.com>
>wrote:
>
>>etu <etu@lasbud.edu> wrote:
>>
>>>On Sat, 10 Jan 2015 06:34:49 -0600, sitkaman wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Fri, 09 Jan 2015 17:10:56 +0100, J. Knasterhuis <j.knasterhuis@localhost> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Thank you very much!!
>>>>>
>>>>>I have a suggestion too.
>>>>>When you create the PAR2 files, you create them not just for the
>>>>>essential files (the VIDEO_TS folder), but also for all the TXT, BMP,
>>>>>JPEG files.
>>>>>
>>>>>This results in missing blocks if any of those non-essential files are
>>>>>missing, and some essential files have to be repaired.
>>>>>
>>>>>This could be aproblem for someone with a very crappy connection, who
>>>>>just needs 1 more block to repair... Or, years into the future, when
>>>>>PAR2 files WILL be needed, it could just all hang on 1 single block
>>>>>missing.
>>>>>
>>>>>Solution: create the recovery files *before* you add the other files
>>>>>(TXT, BMP, JPEG and so on) to the folder where you upload from.
>>>>>
>>>>>See attachement 'Concerning_Recovery_Files.png'.
>>>>>
>>>>>Thanks again!
>>>>>
>>>>snip
>>>>
>>>>Well, I guess I could do that, I have certainly thought about doing it that way.
>>>>
>>>>I'll tell you what, if I hear no conflicting opinions, I'll start doing it that way on
>>>>tomorrows post.
>>>>
>>>>sitkaman
>>>I think the texts and images are worthy to also be included in a .PAR
>>>repair option so that they can be repaired when they get damaged. You
>>>could do a seperate set of .PAR for them. You could also include the
>>>text and images in the .RAR archive when it is up to me.
>>>
>>>Waste of space imho is to include sample.mpg's in .PAR repair specialy
>>>when that is combined with the main RAR achive.
>>
>>Placing the supporting files (jpg, nfo, txt, samples) into the RARs defeats
>>the purpose of allowing the down loader to view these before deciding
>>whether to download the RARs or not.
>
>Place them into the RAR's, make PAR's for it like that. Then upload
>the resulting files PLUS the TXT and image files.
>
>You'll end up with TXT and image files inside RAR's AND outside RAR's.
>The good thing is then that a repair doesn't hang on maybe a single
>block because a JPG image is missing. Anyone of these small files each
>take ONE block of repairfiles... (if PAR-red seperately).
>
>>I have no problem with the supporting files being included in the PAR set
>>but personally I prefer not to do so.
>>
>>You can't please everyone.
>>
>>Thank you for the effort you have been doing on this project. I once
>>wondered how you knew the size etc. for your list of posted DVDs because I
>>did not figure that you had downloaded everything that was posted. I now
>>realize that I was mistaken.
>
>Jaap Knasterhuis.
Wow, a lot of opinions on how this should be done. What I've gathered is that an RAR and
PAR set for the movie, and a seperate RAR/PAR set for the ancillary files might be the
best way to go, as for as current user, and way future user.
I'll try that for a while.
thanks for all the feed back guys, it does make be want to keep going.
sitkaman
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
|
 - "Concerning_Recovery_Files.png" (0/1) 18.6 kBytes yEnc')){kind=link}