On Sat, 01 Nov 2008 13:38:46 -0500, Isis <isis55423@hotpop.com> wrote:
>On Sat, 01 Nov 2008 08:21:40 +0000, Octopussi <octopuse@lds.org> wrote:
>
><snip>
>
>:Why thank you. I'll gladly be a guinea pig. Here's my wish list...
>:
>:http://www.criterion.com/asp/release.asp?id=361
>:http://www.criterion.com/asp/release.asp?id=399
>:
>:I found 2 others that I liked already posted elsewhere and have
>:attached the .nzb's.
>:
>:They are:
>:http://www.criterion.com/asp/release.asp?id=300 (aquatic...)
>:
>:and
>:
>:http://www.criterion.com/asp/release.asp?id=407 (noche...)
>:
>:thanks for the list. Criterion is worthwhile because they have lists
>:of more tasteful intellectual movies.
>
>I can get both of those, but I don't know if they are Criterions until
>they arrive. We'll just to have to wait and see. (Tuesday)
I'm not particular as long as they play ok. To my understanding
Criterion only makes a big difference when the source footage is old
and technologically impaired.
>Thanks for posting the NZB's. (Renaming them to the title would probably
>have been helpful, though!) :)
True...Agent is a bit spotty when it comes to attachments. I really
would have preferred the attachments to be contained within a single
message and named. This should have happened automatically. I can see
why few people use Agent for posting anything. Power Post really is
essential. This is my biggest greivance with Agent. It drops the ball
when it comes to posting binary files. Oh well. If I post nzbs in the
future I will do so one-at-a-time. Sorry friend.
|
|