jimmy <jimmy@nowhereland> wrote in
news:a4f6q4lg888cnhtjvp6p7qbifjtgmtmbg5@4ax.com:
> On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 18:16:51 -0500, "\"Reb\" Ruster"
> <rebruster@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 09:01:42 -0800, jimmy <jimmy@nowhereland> wrote:
>>
>>>On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 10:10:56 -0600, Showers <no-one@nowhere.net>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>Those newsgroups don't exist on giganews.
>>>
>>>So what you want me to do about that??
>>
>>As a suggestion, there is a group called alt.binaries.jimmy.video
>>which is carried on the major news servers. You may want to consider
>>posting there.
>
> Thanks But No!!!!!!!
> I'm not here to services a few that think they
> have a major news server
> But in reality only have a crappy news servers.
> And besides no mater where one post there will always be some saying
> there is no such group or I don't get that group.That's why so many
> don't know about so many groups.
> Myself I'm not here to service those few
> So you people will just have to ask your server to add the group, Or
> change to a real server. Or just keep quite and stop bitching.
It may be all true, jimmy. But in this case you really chose a rare
group. Giganews doesn't have it, Usenetserver doesn't have it, bubbanews
doesn't have it and there are some well known servers more. Are all of
these crappy servers just because they don't care your chosen group?
The only server I know of caring this group is astraweb. But you don't
expect everyone changes to astraweb now, do you? ;-)
So you can see, with this group name you're already serving just a few
people. The most people are not able to see your posts.
The group jimmy.video seems like a good compromise to me. So if you want
to share with all of us, why not switching to a group most servers have?
|
|