On Thu, 09 Apr 2015 12:23:32 -0700, PeggLeg <reply@here.net> wrote:
>With help, I got both, and they look very interesting.
>Thanks Spike for the post and Thanks RIB, and others, for the help.
>Boy, this thread is getting long...
>
>PeggLeg
=====================================================
>> >> > > didn't mention what codec was used. Do you know? XviD? DivX?
>> >> > > I'm hoping it's not X264 or mkv or whatnot
>> >> > > PeggLeg
>> >> >
=====================================================
And there is my downfall PeggLeg... I don't have a clue about the
difference If any) with XviD compared to DivX or X264 and MKV, MP4
compared with each other.
Its not something that I consider when uploading/downloading.
It's also something that I have never bothered to learn about, maybe I
Should :)
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 |
|