Path: news.nzbot.com!spool1.sonic-news.com!news-out.sonic-news.com!not.news-service.com!not.alt.net!not.highwinds-media.com!news.astraweb.com!border5.newsrouter.astraweb.com!not-for-mail  
From: hopper <Troll5layer@avay.invalid>  
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)  
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.crafts.pictures  
Subject: Re: Req.  Would someone please digitize this (1/1)  
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 07:28:03 +1000  
Organization: set Path -9999 Trolls  
References: <i3av851e34cd7m3ng4e5vv6gl4qso7s19r@4ax.com> <0li5959fkt3fe9ov5snfmrh32vbr6ej3kb@4ax.com>  
X-No-Archive: yes  
MIME-Version: 1.0  
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii  
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit  
Lines: 10  
Message-ID: <004c1a19$0$5020$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com>  
NNTP-Posting-Host: 151957ee.news.astraweb.com  
X-Trace: DXC=dCO7GYlOg4A0UO2<>T]L;AL?0kYOcDh@J;GFDAYE_l2CdaFg1GWPFfEDW:P`]bM`VN>JRBhPOH3mBQY^`9H\U`UO  
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.crafts.pictures:8939  
  
Snakepit@pit.com, wrote  
>On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 03:12:34 -0500, Paperboy  
><paperboy@whoknowswhere.com> wrote:  
>  
>Can you possibly scan the image instead of taking a photograph?  A  
>scanned image is much more "workable" than one that is only a  
>photograph.  
  
'ere 'ere... even a scan of a print with "sharps" on  
is going to produce something halfway "workable".  
 |  
  
 |