| 
 | Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.crafts.pictures:19944 Path: news.nzbot.com!spool1.sonic-news.com!pull-news.sonic-news.com!xlned.com!feeder1.xlned.com!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!cyclone03.ams2.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!voer-me.highwinds-media.com!npeersf01.ams.highwinds-media.com!newsfe23.ams2.POSTED!39947f14!not-for-mail
 From: Absinthe Minded <nada@nada.com>
 Newsgroups: alt.binaries.crafts.pictures
 Subject: Re: Someone wanted Jenny Haskins .. Attn: Willy
 Reply-To: none@net.invalid
 Message-ID: <a8osk79jhgb6qro5ovvknc4mmuh0r3j2j8@4ax.com>
 References: <f4WdnZ6Fy43yr9PSnZ2dnUVZ_tGdnZ2d@giganews.com>
 X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 2.0/32.652
 X-No-Archive: yes
 MIME-Version: 1.0
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
 Lines: 33
 X-Complaints-To: http://support.highwinds-media.com
 NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 17:35:17 UTC
 Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 12:35:14 -0500
 
 On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 14:13:04 GMT, LoveCorrie@best.net wrote in:
 <f4WdnZ6Fy43yr9PSnZ2dnUVZ_tGdnZ2d@giganews.com>:
 
 >
 >On 29-Feb-2012, Willy Ewe <we@tinw.invalid> wrote:
 >
 >> Be aware the archive is charged with superfluous files, requiring
 >> hours of sorting to obtain working folders.
 >
 >I hear you load and clear about posting files in future using an archive
 >that is in smaller modules that can be combined in to a finished unit.  I
 >will do some research on google to figure out how to do that.
 >
 >Regarding your comment << "Be aware the archive is charged with superfluous
 >files, requiring hours of sorting to obtain working folders">>
 >
 > I found the Jenny Hasking collection on a bit torrent site, and did spend
 > some time editing the file folder names and adding some pictures when found
 > easily. I did not spend any time editing the collection from what I
 > received other than to verify they were relevant as I was not personally
 > interested in these designs myself.  I assumed that the end user could
 > spend their own time editing the file contents to suit themselves.  I
 > personally am not prepared to spend hours editing the folders for someone
 > else's end use.  If I am incorrect in this assumption, and if  people
 > receiving these files don't won't them unless I have combed through them,
 > in future I will not post such collections.
 >
 >I would appreciate some guideance from other posters on what would be
 >satisfactory to the group
 
 I'm a newbie, so my ideas are only my opinion.  But perhaps each particular
 collection could have been posted separately?  Then we could only download
 the collections we would be interested in.
 
 | 
 
 |