Pixie <Pixie@AnnWheatley.com.invalid> wrote:
>On Sat, 06 Aug 2011 14:12:30 +1000, Timmy
>Baker<email@nd.give.up.your.arse.invalid> wrote:
>
[....]
>>uh uh...
>>/wraps arms around the pole
>>
>>I aint dancin' sorry :->
>>
>The visual of you pole hugging (as opposed to pole dancing) is just a
>scream... :-D
ummm... tis the mode.. of dress?
I do not do feather boas.. if that helps<g>
>And strangely not right at the same time.../laff
>
Style..?.. i s amusing you.. you "young thing" you :-)
dBoss only commented recently "we doan do dancing no more".
My 'quip' went like.. "yeh well, today... if WE danced only
like _I_ know how we would be arrested"!!!
It was the 60's/70's.. yer had to be there<g>
>/snip
>
>>>Bill says they are all safe... mehehe... safe as houses.
>>>
>>yeh... roooight :->
>>
>And we both know what happened to the housing boom in Yankeeland...
>/grin
>
And now they are looking at printing money..!
/rolls eyes
Seems that for a nation so fixated on deep fried whatever
"to go", a few years on wholesome home cooked
rabbit wouldna hurt their Health Services budget<BG>
>You would be the galah??
>/laff
mostly.. around ABCP.. at least <g>
[note].. 'said' in true "Ockerism mode" .. mheh heh
>/later, you have galahs up there???
>
sure have.. in fact you only get yours after
they have bred up here.. bit of a change, for once,
where the kids go south to plunder instead of the
other way around..!
/ducks an' hides
>>definitely .. heh heh
>>
>Too busy huggin' that pole... /grin
>I gotta admit... you have a nice action... rofl...
>
typo?
... and I am pointing at "reaction".. nuffin else.
Though I +am+ chuffed such a young thing as yourself
chose ME to diss with "on the Net"<G>
>>... it doan look good right now.
>>Best we give it some time before panic sets in though :-#
>>
>It woan bother me so much. Super is already a flatliner, but there's
>vegies in the garden and water is in the tanks...
>We is laughing... /grin
>
/nods
It is looking like a blip, still "blipping".. luckily the world has
changed and is now largely Asia focused .. not so much at
the NH markets :-)
>/snip
>
>>>Perhaps some are just naturally more cautious than others?
>>
>>... whatever you gotta tell yourself :-)
>>
>Hah!!! No pinching my material... /grin
>Think up yer own!!
hahahhahahaaaaaaaaaaahh
HEY..!
Once..!
Yer making me out like that Kafflick priest!
"40 years I served my parish.. blest , birthed and married .. then
buried them. Now.. I take ONE goat home... and...."
>Notice the question mark... I wassun tellin', I was askin'...
>
I (and you) gotta be careful with "sweeping statements" but
I am thinking it is true to say you are being waaay
"liberal" in your view... sorry :-(
>>My experience says
>> "get the bulk of the work
>> done and just trim the edges"
>>.. type of thing.
>>
>Hmmm... I get that...
>
my "attitude"..?
If so.. it aint.
On the record for helping those who _show_ they will help
themselves... "fish and fishing rods" type thing :-)
>>This goes to posts also.. not just digitising.
>>And is why we see archives of every format uploaded.
>>Not whining about it, just providing that as a very good \
>>example of
>> "here is what I have . now give me..."
>>
>>It does not take an overwhelming deal of effort to produce a post
>>of usefulness and accuracy (to the request) but it does take a whole lot of
>>effort to sort crap that is downloaded.. ask me how I know :-/
>>
>There are some here who dunno what crap looks like. I ain't sure why
>that is.
>
You think that latest "Disaster Blaster" (Lady Di) didn't know what
they were doing?
Sorry.. I disagree.. strongly.
That has all been done before today.. here and elsewhere on
Usenet binary froups.
"blow in. criticise - whilst showing clearly there isn't a brain
engaged - load the place with crap. then buzz off.
You around when "Internet Chick" posted.. and a few immediately
after that poster "lifted the skirt" and flounced off??
>>I doubt that.. seriously :-)
>>
>You reckons you could handle more than one of me??...
>Yeah... roight...
>ROFL
>
weel.. it would be nice to see a room largely occupied by
your stereotype.
/blush
but I am wishing :->>
Wishing I could then sit back and just do my own thing :-)
>>In one specific country there is always litigation to fall back on.
>>That mob use it for everything. Here in Usenet where it is possible
>>to stay anon (so they read) maybe the "careful kid" gets
>>shoved in the cupboard?
>>See what I am saying?
>>
>Yeah... but they only "think" they is anonymous.
/ cue Sybil
heh
>The only one here who really is, is you.
>
As in "profile"..?.. maybe, yeh.
But that said, anyone caring to do the work and look around will
easily find me elsewhere. That 'style' is deliberate, though mind
you a few have tried copying it.. not successfully<weg>
I would think you too could claim same?
So that is two.. no?
>>.. they are anon, or so believe.
>>And those touting such activity have never seen
>>(let alone be able to read) the SMTP headers of an
>>email, any email.
>>
>Filled out my Census today. A day early. The amount of ppl doing it
>online is hilarious.
/nods
Luckily it isn't that widely advertised we do this (Census Night).
But yeh.. in today's paper the story about that guy in WA losing his
house/s to the Nigerian scammers has come up again.
Seems the scammers have found a way around the laws made the
last time.. another one is gone.. from someone else!
>You saw the bit about having your data deleted and not available to
>the public after 99 years??
>Yeah... roight...
>
As I see it.. there aint nuffin innit that the Gummint doan already have.
The things that worry me are like Yahoo has just changed their interface
again and *now* you doan get in your mail box until you Do provide an
alternate _valid_ address.
The scary bit is they prompt you with another of your Yahoo email
addresses. Now.. I am *very* careful my browser (Opera) does not
"dob me in" but whadda-ya-noe.. up comes one of my more errr 'sekrit'
addresses as a "recommendation". How did Yahoo bot know that address?
I have no histories maintained in my surfing, and delete every "cookie" on
exit from the session. And yeh. I doan swap from one address to the other
in the same session... and I make sure my IPN rotates on login.. next session.
The clincher is.. when you provide an address, and Yahoo lets you at your
mail, you are prompted with new mail from Admin which proceeds to
congratulate you on updating your data!
What braindead programmer thought that 'strategy' up.
Like.. hello..! you are "locked out" until you do provide the data..!
Then there is Hotmail.. that server wont let you in until you "upgrade" your whole
freakin' browser software!
yep.. THEY want your data.. it is worth Squillions!
>>nup.
>>Sorry.. I aint dancin' no more :->
>>
>Eh... shame.
>
nup.
... I feel better for it. No "grandstanding" jus' trying to avert "chicks" as
yourself - as kindly intended as it is - from urging me to "reach out".
I understand much better now why it was Don sat back more
than I thought he should, rightly. And why it was that the few that
learnt digitising here took to the road once they knew enough to "get by".
I see something _I_ want to do.. it gets done. In my time. Period.
>>I did.. as you see ... it diddun work<g>
>>
>Musta... yer still here... /grin
>
yeh.. so..?
heh.. not you too..!..?
I said "I am going to do as others do".
Carnt be clearer than that... eh?:-)
>>I have (do) enjoy our chats, even despite the few
>>times I have had to hop out with me arse on fire!
>>
>Oh poop!
>Whinge if yer bum was on fire, you... /laff
>Oh... wait... :-D
>
Hey.. it IS all "good fun".. believe.. an' no 'pouting' from
you, Missy.
As I see it you are my "carbon saver".... heh heh
>>All taken in exemplary bon homie, as they say :-)
>>
>Yes, you have been the soul of discretion.
>
hhhheh.. "evasive" is you sayin' ..?<g>
>>None of that will change, Just do not presume I
>>would spend another minute providing proof of the BS
>>this idiot sprouts:
>>Message-ID: <m%n_p.52090$7K4.27840@newsfe14.iad>
>>or
>>feeding the please of nymswitchers
>>Message-ID: <klvo37lde0m2up9700qlf4k42u3tdgrup7@4ax.com>
>>Message-ID: <qhtu275ccrsnb99mjakr93gjrvqgpm464e@4ax.com>
>>.... attached is what I got done of one such requestor who
>>hasn't even bothered to respond.
>>Message-ID: <6%1Xp.103084$nZ1.41792@en-nntp-15.dc1.easynews.com>
>>
>Unfortunates... one and all...
>
Indeed so.. and more to the point, a growth of vacuousness that is
fast becoming overwhelming. Now, WHEN Google Groups falls
over, which it will , we can only expect "more of the same" as those
unfortunates also flock to NSPs in reaching their 'haunts' around Usenet.
Interesting times ahead, again.
And the NH winter approaches, rapidly<g.
>>I can only assume then it is yet another slab of bait designed
>>to waste folks time.
>>
>Well, ya gotta admit... some WERE a bit obvious!! /grin
>You musta been a bit bored to play wiff some of them!
>
ummm.. no? I had my own game to play in amongst it all.
And nobody can deny that even when done as "fun" there is always
something learnt from building each work.. even if only partially done.
Which reminds me.. I forgot to attach that work last post.. so here
it is now .. mheh heh
>>/ off for me nanny-nap:->
>>
>Oh! The life of the rich and idle... /grin
>Sleeping in the middle of the day... whooda thunk it?!
>
Not during those times I was busting me gut in the boiler room
of Life, no.. the thought never crossed my mind.
I hear the jungle drums beating.. gotta go look :-)
oooRoo
--
kit
<< [logo]VonDutch.hus >>
|
|