On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 05:36:19 +1000, prntGuy <pG@paper.no> wrote in:
<4d865745$0$8770$c3e8da3$aae71a0a@news.astraweb.com>:
>Erma <none@none.com> wrote:
>>On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 07:09:25 +1000, prntGuy <pG@paper.no> wrote in:
>><l2u4o6d5j0jqs7epa88n9c6buuv5nlanb7@4ax.com>:
>>
>[....]
>>Is it possible to take this pdf and have some of the pages at one dpi and
>>other pages at another? Did that make sense?
>Yes and Yes ... but.. :-)
>
>>What I was wondering was...you say pages 3-8 could use the
>>dpi increased a bit. I can see what you mean.
>>They are a bit hard to see(well, ok...a lot hard to see) Can I
>>take this document and have pages 1,2,9-13 at 150 and pages 3-8 at 175 or
>>even 200 all in the same document? If so, how would I go about this. This
>>is the first I've worked on reducing pdf size, and I couldn't see how on my
>>own.
>the "but"..
>Depends on software ability.
>
>>>For a document that size 2MB would not be an
>>>unreasonable outcome for posting size.
>>Or is the 2MB size you refer to for the whole document done in say 175 or
>>slightly higher dpi?
>Yep...
>
>>>That said..?... the tute appears to be the purpose
>>>of the document with the sewing detail "added in".
>>>Using that premise I would say... job is done.
>>>The pictures and instructions are fine as they
>>>are now, either print.
>>>
>>>.. "goldstar" stuff... btw :-)
>>Thanks...I had a good teacher ;-) (I followed a post you had made a while
>>back with instructions)
>/blush
>
>.. and embahwessmint cos the memory is
>lost in the mist of time :->
>
>What you are asking is maybe something you
>already know of but not "how to", yes?
Yes, I don't know how to YET. But I will learn.
>Essentially you "break up" the document into
>pages and edit each page then join them
>together again.
>Make sense?
Absolutely! That's kinda what I was thinking had to be done. I just
didn't know how to do the re-joining. I'll figure it out. This is my
first experience working with a pdf. I'll read up.
>How it is done depends on the abilities of the
>software used. PDF is "postscript" (ps) so
>many a tool will do what you ask.
>I would need some time to research this.
>Maybe it is more efficient for you to start
>without me:-)
>
>cheers
Thanks again for your time. I appreciate it.
|
|