Pixie <Pixie@AnnWheatley.com.invalid>:sayed
>On Wed, 03 Nov 2010 19:32:13 +1000, hopper
>
>>Pixie <Pixie@AnnWheatley.com.invalid>:sayed
>>>On Wed, 03 Nov 2010 00:05:30 +1000, hopper
>>>
>>
>
>>/snipT
>>
>>
>>>Chasing virgins at your age??
>>>
>>I remembered that Newcastle Song
>>verse... humming whilst I type<g>
>>
>He was running from, not running to if'n I recall!
>
You assume it is a nerd humming??
Truly Maam.. I think I am offended..!!
/snuckles
>>So.. tis just "garnish", again.
>>
>Wilcom is as good at it as anyone else.
>You have this colour worry thing blocking your thinking.
>If I change the colours on something, it's not a slight on the
>digitiser, it just means I would like another colour instead.
>A blue fairy dress instead of a pink one... is all!
>It's not a hanging offence!
>
Agreed. However this is not where I was pointing.
Colours, as much as layer application, are the
elements for "depth of field".
The digitiser is the only one in control of that
when doing the project. The 'creator' if you like.
When the design hits the hoop the sewer is going to
be greatly disappointed should they not be skilled
in preserving the spectrum to give depth of field.
Doesn't mean the _same_ colours need be used
tho' it does mean to sew out the intended 'image'
the colours used must be chosen with depth of
field in mind.
Make sense?
/snip
>>hah..!!
>>I am one step in front at last..!!
>>Just gotta figure out the when and where<bg>
>>
>Ugh... I've created a monster!
>/grin
>
Not quite.. the horns still have rutting dust on 'em<g>
/snip
>>soo.. I got this right?
>>I just use what looks good to me and the sewer can
>>handle whatever.. yessss?
>>
>You have been doing this all along.
>
I do try to, yes :-)
>What I have found to be "handy" (if you like), is to make colour
>options available via intelligent digitising.
>By this I mean, doan make the pink cheeks connect to the pink dress as
>one colour sequence...
>
oH I get that.. did back in Lesson#
"here is the Willy screen, follow the outline of the duck".
/chuckle
>Scrabble taught me word spin and Monopoly taught me that you always
>buy, you never rent...
>/laff
>
ahhhh... Yeeeessss
But here is the "but".
The Yanks took Scrabble, rounded up the consonants,
and starved them, many died.
The elite, the vowels, they gang raped.
So today.."Scrabble skills on the Net"??
A source of great hilarity... me thinks :-))))
/snip
>The worst part??
>I can see you in Tux and red shoes... /laff
>
Wow... fashion sense..!!
You got it all..!!
Incredible :-}
>All that pumpin' helps ya lift all them big fish...
>Not!!!
>/laff
>
I doan need no help with fish lifting around
this place <g>
/snip
>>feh..!!.. whadda **ewe** noe about racing horses??!!??
>>
>More than you! My horse/s beat yours!
>
Mine is now stabled with a $50M walking bundle of dogfood.
I say that trumps your hay burners result<g>
/snip
>>Same effect as "glazed eye syndrome" in men.. the jewels
>>tuck "taint" high during that last 250metres..!
>>baaa b00m..!!
>>
>Only if there is a mare in front of them...
>/snigger...
>
Not when it has an arse like Fritz's..!
/glances over at galloping Frau
disappearing into the brush
/snip
>>Until I aint so interesting no more.. heh heh
>>
>How old is She??
>I'm sure "two minute attention span" applies here??!!
>
So much to cover so quick.. is all:->>
/snipT
>>Not I.. tis a Fact you can have two kids playing together.
>>One at $6 day.
>>The other at $80 a day.
>>It is how it is.
>>
>Then the parent paying $80 a day is an idiot... yes?
>
If you say being overshadowed by welfare is
being stupid..?..
yeh, you are likely right.
>More money that brains??
>
More like a propensity to work hard and provide.. I say.
But yeh.. seems the world agrees that is a stoopid outlook.
/shrug
>Working for nothing, not watching their child progress, and still
>wondering why they are tired all the time.
>
ummm.. a well educated, wanted child, is not "nothing".
Yes?
>>Oh I diddun say ALL are bullies/brats.. again it is the 1%ers.
>>
>Then that is Life! Woan learn how to deal with a little pressure if
>not tested a little every now and again...
>by those bratty poor kids... /grin
>
There is "testing" and then there is outright bastardry.
Seeing how some behave around Usenet I am not
surprised the 1%ers are the brats they are.
feh..!
>>Just that, in a balanced world, those kids would not be in that
>>situation.. or born even.
>> <shrug>
>>
>She'll be ok! In your day, your parents would have sayed to either
>bite them back, hit them back or kick them back.../laff
>
And then bury them <g>
Never let the corpses stink up one's day:->>
/snipT
>>Nothing better to see than the sight of fleeing Mexicans heading South
>>in the runup to a good storm <bg>
>>
>They'll be back.../laff
>
With the money.
/rubs hands together
>>Crikey.. that is a long stretch of the rubber..!!
>>From a booming economy to fake pearls to dumb millionaires.
>>You sure have a wide scope of range in... trolling.. mheh heh heh
>>
>I learned from the best...
>You having trouble keeping up??? rofl...
>
I think I am in rebound mode..!
/lmao
>>Definitely slows the fingers in getting to the core.. of it :-)
>>
>It helps if you try not to laugh out loud when you is typing.../grin
>
Taking breaks helps also.. two hours to build this post.
I ache:->>>>
>>cYa in a day or so.. got business here.
>>BBL
>>
>Good luck wiff dat... yer gonna need it.
>
Looking good so far.
I am off.. catch ya on the weekend :-)
--
hopper
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 |
|