Sorry the thought never occurred to me to redraw the image without the
detail, I would never expect someone to go through that! I have kind
of been fiddling around with it this morning trying to get some of the
detail out of it!
Unfortunately, I don't have access to the digitized file, I asked my
son to try to get it from whomever did his hats, but he didn't know
what I was talking about. I thought I would surprise him, he was
coming home this week and I was going to put his logo on a shirt for
him.
Yes, if I remember correctly, the fish had too much dappling, but it
could of just been poorly digitized. The best way I know how to
describe it, is that it just looked too thick, but I don't know much
about digitizing. I tried to learn when I got my machine and it was
too complicated for me!!! If I could ask a question, and I hope it is
not stupid, is this logo just too detailed to stitch and have it look
nice?
Anyhow, if I am able to get some detail out of it, I will resend,
thank you so much Herb, for taking a look at this for me, and for
giving me your input.
Nursie
On Sun, 12 Oct 2008 03:49:21 -0700, Herb <Herb@the.herb.garden> wrote:
>idonthaveanemail@hotmail.com wrote:
>
>> This is the logo for my son's new business, he had this professionally
>> digitized but I don't think it came out too well. The fish had too
>> much detail and looked gawdy. If someone could give this a shot with
>> maybe not quite so much detail in the fish I think it would look much
>> better. The logo should be the right size, it is approx. 2.5" L x
>> 2.25" W. No background stitching. My machine format is pes. Thank
>> you to anyone giving this a try.
>> Nursie
>
>Well, that logo HAS a lot of detail - and in a 2 and a half inch size
>you're right - it's much too much to squeeze in there! You might try
>using the same color thread in areas where it changes to reduce the
>technicolor effect, while keeping some of the texture.
>
>If you could provide an image with the unwanted detail omitted or
>modified, it would be possible to re-do it for you. As it is, it's
>hard for someone else to know which details could be omitted, and
>which are significant to you. For example - how much of the fish
>detail is desired? Do you want a solid dorsal area or just some of the
>dappling or ??? And then re-draw the logo to be digitized - it would
>really be an imposition to ask someone else to redraw it to the level
>of detail you want. YOU have seen the stitched logo and know what
>parts of if don't look right to you.
>
> - Herb
|
|
')){kind=link}