Pixie <Pixie@AnnWheatley.com.invalid>wrote:
>On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 07:56:32 +1000, hopper
>
>>Pixie <Pixie@AnnWheatley.com.invalid>wrote:
/snip
>>>Wishing and fishing on my behalf??
>>>
>>Not entirely.
>>There are those who will understand
>>"give a man the rod and he shall catch his own fish".
>>Then there are others who will find the technology
>>simply exhausts them in acquiring the skill.
>>Also... remember.. digitisers "do it" because they want
>>to.
>>
>/snicker...
>Oh!! Heard that somewhere's, didja...??
>
<q>
Give a man a fish and you have a friend for an hour.
Give a man a fishing rod and you have a friend for
Life.
</q>
That one?
Crikey how did I survive past weaning without me
Mum..hunting me up!
/snip
>>I reckon even Kofi Annan, as another retired "old
>>coot", wouldn't want the job<g>
>>
>Yes! A delicate balance of back scratching...
>Kofi Annan??... Twas His birthday last week..
>
The same.. and yes, I SMS'd him.. you>
>Apols to budding digitisers out there...
>I was only addressing the two with the most press (at the moment).
>The loudest and the not so loud one..../grin
>
/scuffs toe in 6.5pH dirt
wellll... I do only handle stage lighting, ya noe.
I could bang a drum or sumthin' if that helps.. yer
hearing??
[wizard grin]
>>http://ickes.us/embrodiery.aspx
>>
>>.. hardly even seemingly passable :-0
>>
>You're terrible, Muriel.... !!!
>
Shocking , eh?
Even given the poor photography, I shrank from
the thought.. fancy having to smile broadly and utter
"why thank you kindly Mom" on getting one of THOSE for
Xmas..!!!
>How did that Brother design get sewed out using a Singer??
>Brother says that is not possible..... ROFL
> :-^
>
Dunno.. you tell me.
I haint no "copyright X-Spurt".
/hands in air
>>
>2006/7 was a tragic year for flame wars...
>
"tragic" because it was run(fed) by morons
or
"tragic" cos the morons lost? :-/
>something few wish to revisit.
>
oH I dunno abowd that... nothing like a bit of
'nose-bleed' to separate the wimmins from the
men<bfg>
>Now it should just be about constructive learning.
>School was never this sensitive to criticism!
>
.. agreed.. and yes to working a way forward to more
independence for those so dependant here (ABCP)..
>>The problem then is what does one "rebuild" in an image
>>and still meet the expectations of the requestor?
>>One has to run through a "is this what you want to see"
>>type scenario.
>>With the limited feedback so far experienced -- using
>>that method -- only frustration and wasted time has
>>been the result. For both parties no doubt.
>>
>Hmmm. A situation that won't improve until everyone understands the
>basic rules of digitising.
>
I say it wont improve until people quit with reading
their own press.
Like,, "Is <Blah.pes> out there?"... and that is the
only thread read.. ever :-/
I have just built a response for one such dude/dudette
>Yeah, you start with a graphic, but if one is going to persist with
>programs that need a perfect graphic.... there will be tears.
>
A defined graphic gets half (sometimes more) the
immediate structural work done... and eliminates any
guessing the digitiser is often asked (subliminally) to
do.
>A good program will allow changes to be done by hand - moving stitch
>points if the auto biz got it wrong.
>
agreed.. BUT.. a defined graphic can be used to
_minimise_ that work.
>In saying that... I just saw Snickle's request..... ROFL
>
Yeh.. well that woman is a fskn lost cause and a plain
outright thief of time to boot.
Has been since Day 01 back in August 2004 :-]
/snip
>>
>Yeah, I have a date with some music and a dance floor.
>
On a Tuesday..!!!
Heavy demand .. huh??
>>cYa
>>
>Figuritively speaking, yessums.
>
Well a bit hard to get me head into Skype.
I am told I will have to wait until the wide screen
technology overcomes the 600mm (2ft) barrier.
Now IF it was my tight buns you were peeking at.. no
problemeo...!
/LMAO
cheerio
--
hopper
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
|