On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 22:06:47 -0500, "hopper"
>
><just little old me@theuniverse.com> wrote in message
>news:f0tlp51h3oos826ig6m0blarg4jn6qojp3@4ax.com...
>So is this not acceptable or should I post at the bottom....or maybe I
>should put in each comment in the text of the original? So many
>rules...such a little mind of mine...and what is wrong with
>justme?...oh I see...selfish as Just Me...not what I meant...more like
>just poor little ole me...but I can be anything here and when answers
>or responses are ambiguous I get confused...
>
>
>On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 09:12:24 -0500, "hopper"
>
>>
>>news:MIjmn.405918$FK3.301434@en-nntp-06.dc1.easynews.com...
>>justme@theuniverse.comwrote:
>>>On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 18:09:15 -0800, Herb <Herb@the.herb.garden> wrote:
>>>
>>[top posting twit corrected]
>>
>>>>justme@theuniverse.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>>If you don't use Agent's REPLY function, there's no way for Ella to
>>>>know which post of hers you're talking about. If you can't reply, at
>>>>least be specific, with details in the text portion (not the subject)
>>>>of the message.
>>>>
>>>> - Herb
>>>Well I am gonna guess that Ella understood just fine, since she has
>>>posted the requested file. Thank you Ella!
>>
>>Well that is just fine and dandy for you and Ella :-~
>>What about the rest of the crowd, today, tomorrow or
>>next month?
>
>I really don't think a reply of Thank you is anything someone would
>want to find in the future, since it was not part of any file and
>really had no relavance to the actual download...But maybe, so I will
>try to be better.
>>
>>Looking at your choice of user name I am not surprised
>>you do not give a fiddlers fart for those seeking the
>>whole of the files at some time in the future.
>>Part of forming that opinion is your displayed example
>>of "top posting"..
>>lazy
>>dumb
>>ignorant
>>naive
>I pick naive!
>>
>>pick a descriptor :-/
>>
>>You are driving a tool which many contributed to for
>>years in educating developers/programmers as to filling
>>out with many handy features.. you can not even be
>>bothered to use the two basic ones.
>Wow I have never been called a tool...I thought only men were tools.
>
>>
>>The ability to reply at the click of a mouse.
>Found the button!
>>
>>The ability to mount the reply text at the click of a
>>mouse
>Mounting reply at the click of a mouse!
>>
>>Do work on your Usenet performance.. please.
>>
>>--
>>
>>
>>Top posting was the only thing I could think of to pick at.
>>See my shining example of how to post. It demonstates my superior
>>intellect.
>>
>>If I don't keep you peeps down I won't look superior. <snarf>
>
>
>
>
>LOVE this place! And LOVE all of you...except maybe that person that
>sometimes post under the wrong name....how cowardly!
>
>>
>>cheers
>hugs...I give them away free!
>
>
>I post under many names. I changed my nym every day a one
>time just to irritate the ignorant crowd here. They carnt block you
>when you are this important.
>
>Remember I always use MOE as a reader. Check the headers and be sure.
>Now behave and stop your top ignorance.
You know I am thinking that I read a post where the REAL Hopper never
uses MOE....and....sumpin bout "abuse@blahblah Will the real (?)
please stand up?
>
>cheers
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
|