I prefer boys to have reached an age at which they can choose for themselves
what they do with their privates before anyone engages them.
I think your posts serve to reinforce the lowest opinions of boylovers as
shatterers of innocence and people whose appetites know no boundaries.
Aside from those critcisms, you are, of course, free to post, as I am free
to avoid your posts. As I typically download anything I don't have and
review it afterward, I was unable to avoid your firrst posts. Perhaps
you'll let us know if you move on to boys who have reached the "age of
reason" and could conceivably be put on trial for murder, like the boy in
Arizona. You've got to wonder what that boy meant when he said his dad and
co-worker were "suffering" as his reason for shooting them.
If you took the photos, I hope you get some therapy and stop using such
young babies to satisfy your lust. I hope you are also prepared to pay for
the therapy they may need as the grow into maturity and figure out how you
have betrayed them.
Only when a boy can unsolicitously entice you into a sex act is it even
vaguely pardonalble to succomb. Typically, it is the adult who is the
aggressor with boys this young. They may masturbate themselves at that age,
but they surely don't invite others to engage with them sexually, or take
photos of their genitals.
Hey...you asked...
|
|