"Pvt.Panic" <pvt@panic.null> wrote in
news:zImdncM_lrDCJXvVnZ2dnUVZ_qLinZ2d@giganews.com:
> On Fri, 03 Oct 2008 18:46:53 -0500, GoodOldMe wrote:
>
>> Not necessarily "new" content, but stuff like the late great
>> Dr.Strangelove used to post. Art book scans, classic Japanese
>> photobooks and magazines, the things that used to keep this group
>> filled in years past.
>>
>> On Fri, 3 Oct 2008 17:45:10 -0500, "Bill Viverette"
>> <wviverette@comcast.net> wrote:
>>
>>>what a waste
>>>grimy images of girls
>>>some of them unclothed
>>>move on, please!
>>>
>>>this group BADLY needs new content.
>>>
>>>a fan (of the past)
>
> Re: new content;
>
> I recently scanned and posted 'Anjos Proibidos' but never heard any
> response (excepting Unfinished §weet). This makes it hard to justify
> cracking the spine of a $300 art book, or even a $100 Japanese mook.
>
> I have other books/mooks to scan/post but can't be bothered to invest
> the time if nobody is here to appreciate it. Further, some material is
> impossible to post these days without getting TOS'd by angry copyright
> crusaders. Oh, or jailed by prudish and angry LEO/LEA types :-(
>
> That said, I agree that spamming screen caps from grossly outdated
> film prints (of dubious quality) is an annoyance at best. At least he
> could grab some new caps from the remastered DVD prints...
>
> Finally, why don't you two post some new stuff? Lead by example ;-)
>
> Cheers,
> Pvt.Panic
>
I've only just looked at Anjos Proibidobs, and a beautiful post it was,
so belated thanks! I understand your dilemma and the overwhelming urge
for you to say get stu**ed!
But please persist, i certainly appreciate your efforts.
BTW. although again I appreciate the effort I also am dissapointed with
the DH screen caps.
Aussie bob
|
|
 67666 bytes')){kind=link}