alt.binaries.alPrev. Next
Re: Kamilla set 86 (71 of 71) - yEnc "wallpaper.JPG" (1/1)
Neighsayer (neighsayer@domain.invalid) 2011/07/09 14:22

Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.al:1303
Path: news.nzbot.com!spool1.sonic-news.com!pullnews.sonic-news.com!feeder.news-service.com!ecngs!feeder.ecngs.de!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2011 15:22:00 -0500
From: Neighsayer <neighsayer@domain.invalid>
Subject: Re: Kamilla set 86 (71 of 71) - yEnc "wallpaper.JPG" (1/1)
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.al
References: <4e171939$0$1809$c3e8da3$9b4ff22a@news.astraweb.com>
 <tOWdnZKQ4YaY3orTnZ2dnUVZ8r-dnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <n9mf17p7vv08vsdufplkkok3qn73gotde2@4ax.com>
X-No-Archive: Yes
User-Agent: Pan/0.133 (House of Butterflies)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <G4udnffU37n1JYXTnZ2dnUVZ7qKdnZ2d@giganews.com>
Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2011 15:22:00 -0500
Lines: 19
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-vjroXevNEUospocKTyJTv1uzQNVQAEM/rPsh0AW9e/Xz60sEzFimQM6j08te7cXlt4OBXM3k5hIUF5v!R82pdxn21MSs1ms0R+oqbkpYwg0TkBFJuxQ8r9RRhaLDv+UuFnpnC9hlXLDR535QnuXcz2Q0Zmo=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 2152

On Sat, 09 Jul 2011 00:31:33 -0400, Nobody Special wrote:

> This was in the set as originally posted (same creation date). I guess
> whoever posted it liked the slip and made it into wallpaper. Why get so
> upset?

Because newbies save those sets as legit, including the cropped crap, and
then it eventually gets reposted by some clueless snot-boy, and we'll
have it entered into various kinds of CRC files, and whatever.

Same problem when newbies repost sets and either rename them because they
don't like the "random looking" file names, or they don't tell where it
came from. There have been loads of sets posted over the years where
either the images were renamed or the images were entered into the wrong
set, or worse, some jerk "enhanced" the images and then reposted them,
not telling anyone this was the case.

I've seen loads of sets go down the drain over the years. So don't get me
started about why I get upset!

Follow-ups:123
Next Prev. Article List         Favorite