| Re: Media censored Bush photo-op in Iraq |
Posted via Supernews, ht .. |
| () |
2003/12/03 21:08 |
Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: Laura Bush-Murderess in our WH <>
Newsgroups: alt
Subject: Re: Media censored Bush photo-op in Iraq
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2003 21:08:22 -0700
Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com
Message-ID: <6mctsvg37igusun42ln0h3igfgem6gh3l7@4ax.com>
References: <u39ssv4nloejnvispal2lubltj7jurr70n@4ax.com> <eIpzb.408556$Tr4.1171321@attbi_s03> <53bssvcfet6g7nlaurvlp1e5ksj644fkno@4ax.com> <Fgqzb.405656$HS4.3265793@attbi_s01>
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: abuse@supernews.com
Lines: 21
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt:57
On Wed, 03 Dec 2003 18:51:17 GMT, "Thomas Trust"
<Trust@Americanpride.com> wrote:
>
><Laura Bush-Murderess in our WH> wrote in message
>news:53bssvcfet6g7nlaurvlp1e5ksj644fkno@4ax.com...
>>
>> Then the trip should have been cancelled. This was not news, just a
>> photo-op and the press has no obligation to censor itself to help bush
>> win votes. Next question.
>
>
>No, the Commander in Chief can visit troops if he damn well pleases. The
>actual visit isn't what bothers you, it's that he's doing the right thing
>and looking good doing it is what's bothering you, it pisses you off.
>
If bush cared only about the troops he'd have just left the press
behind and gone to iraq without them. But no - he wanted the
photo-op.
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
|
|