Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: Fred Hall <fkhall@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.sex.beastiality
Subject: Re: greenery
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2011 01:07:10 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: Nekkid Dancers
Lines: 127
Message-ID: <Xns9F8FEB1FE802Arustytavek@208.90.168.18>
References: <9ip1ccwqlbsz.dlg@copper.aluminium>
User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25
X-WebTV-Stationery: Standard; BGColor=black; TextColor=black
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.sex.beastiality:1034
shadow <gold@silver.platinum> wrote in
news:9ip1ccwqlbsz.dlg@copper.aluminium:
> i cant believe humans arent being cloned!!!! you fuck sheep
> but you cant fuck with a human?? oooh sheep are so much more
> simple? they are mammals.
Sqiggle would agree
>
> i stopped reading the news, have monkeys been cloned yet? i
> would imagine that would raise the bar.
Monkeys would reject squiggle as a lesser life form
>
> why should humans be cloned? simple, for slave labour. just
> imagine, fifty oppenheimers on the military dole, or fifty
> feynman for a university faculty? you think people with
> power wouldnt want to exponentiate their earnings?
Squiggle could extort more money from his mother. Just ask the kids
>
> look clones would feel betrayed. like they never had a true
> origin. like they were made in an assembly line, and are now
> servicing the customers like machines. hell you could even
> institute a rule that all clones have their skin tone to
> have an inhuman colour, like...ummmm... blue or even red.
> green, yes green, that would fucking stand out like a tree.
> all clones must be green. well they wont be clones then,
> would they? having them identified would be a nice moral
> challenge.
Squiggle thinks so. He's always asking his mother, "Ma, ma, who's my
pa?
>
> making clones of losers would be self-defeating. i would
> never qualify, so its nice to know, that i wont be cloned.
> unless slaves are needed in the traditional sense. but
> machines have circumvented that. plus all the various energy
> supplies, unless they run out, else it will turn into grunt
> human slavery.
This is why squiggle won't work, preferring to be supported by his
mother
>
> lets say there exists some model employee who answers to
> customer queries, one of those big trends of using poorer
> and poorer people to do essentially, an answering machine
> type job. you could have clones, a company could make the
> ideal customer service clones, and sell those people or
> contract them out, for even less than the poorest people in
> sub-saharan africa. all the industries would jump.
squiggle would be returned as defective
>
> problem, that would also circumvent the employment security
> and the civilised uncloned idiot. they would have what to
> do?? force themselves into bond-age, rivaling the clones??
> but the clones are properties of their manufacturers, like
> machines, and as such, do not need maintenance beyond food
> and shelter stuff.
Squiggle's long-suffering mother should be so lucky. Just ask the kids
>
> the clones would have no rights, and the usual politics and
> psychotics of human behaviour would play out again, except,
> it would be very interesting to see what happens in the case
> of clones.
heh
>
> very early, like in roman times, slaves did not know where
> they came from, they were sold like fruits and clay pots.
> but here, records would be present. assuming they arent
> buried in international....diplomatically orchestrated
> policy of global censor, the clones would find themselves
> similarly placed.
bullshit
>
> however, they arent being manufactured because they are dumb
> and cannot do anything. very interesting state of affairs
> that would be, to have slave clones, far superior to the
> general population, based on some pre-ideal identified
> element. its effect for uncloned employment?
Walmart wouldn't hire you?
>
> if there are no people to buy, there are no people to sell
> to. maybe companies would have deals with each other in the
> maintenance of the clones. a happy clone assembly line is a
> functioning clone slave.
Still making excuses for why you won't look for a job?
>
> do you know when, i think, the clones would become
> preferable??????????????? unless artificial intelligence
> circumvents simple employment duties -- and until the very
> last bastion of poverty is exploited until their pride and
> ego later become inflated enough to demand greater. clone
> slaves would not be so appealing. once they become cheaper
> to manufacture and keep on "employment" they wont be done in
Further evasion noted
> good numbers.
>
> code is cheaper than a clone i suppose, for some tasks. a
> machine cannot fuck a human satisfactorily.
>
But the reverse is true. Just ask goatfucking squiggle. Ask the kids
--
"These clowns are all Jokers!" - Rasta Khan
|
|