On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 09:24:23 GMT, Animated GIF Man
<AGMLiteForU@aol.com> wrote:
>On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 01:10:10 -0500, DOC
><docREMOVEthis@it-smells.com> wrote in alt.multimedia.tk :
>
>>
>> On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 03:53:30 GMT, Temest <X@Y.com> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 20:07:01 -0500, Doc
>> > <docREMOVEthis@it-smells.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >>
>> >> Ah, Ahem... Poster says he is not gay. Has said so repeatedly.
>> >>
>> >
>> > ahh I get it, so the fact that he obsessively collects Male/male
>> > tickling has nothing to do with a sexual nature??
>> >
>> > Thank god for a while I thought I had a female foot fetish....
>> > ya know downloading pics of fem feet and all !! Right Doc?
>> >
>>
>> LOL
>>
>> I'm only reporting on what has been said. You can make
>> your own logical conclusions. But the 'net is a strange place.
>>
>
>You're so right, Doc... I'm a widely professed gay man
>who collects ALL sexual orientations of tickling clips,
>images + stories + my */F material actually outnumbers
>my */M material at a better than 5 to 1 ratio. Tickling
>is tickling + sex is sex. Neither has to be entwined nor
>does one's own sexual orientation preclude collecting
>a different gender orientation. If the guy says he's str8
>he may very well be.
>
>Why is every collector of M/M material assumed to be
>gay, when every F/F collector is free to have mounds
>of material up to their eyeballs but aren't accused of
>"really being dykes"? You're right, the net is strange.
I am a dyke trapped in a mans body I love f/f tickling
|
|