Chris Croughton wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 14:12:57 GMT, Miss Elaine Eos
> <Misc@*your-shoes*PlayNaked.com> wrote:
[...]
>> At any rate, does anyone know where this form originated, and
>> whether or not it is considered proper?
>
> It is considered to be not improper <g>. However, over use of the
> form can be annoying to readers (as in Hardy, above). There are
some
> words where it doesn't make much sense, though:
>
> not uncertain
> not improbable
It's a perfectly normal usage in formal and informal English, and I
think it always has been. Certainly, a writer or speaker can over-use
it; but that doesn't invalidate the usage. I think the idea that it's
related to the British (and American: avoid easy stereotyping here)
liking for understatement is good; but it's perfectly possible in
other languages too -- it actually feels quite French to me. I can't
give an early example, though I did unsuccessfully try a quick search
in Michael Quinion's super
http://www.worldwidewords.org/index.htm
Going to
http://www.mastertexts.com/index.php?PageName=Search
you'll find that most of the first page of examples of "not
impossible" and "not improbable" are translations from the French. I
haven't tried any others.
If you go to Google Groups alt.usage.english and search a few
examples such as "not impossible" etc, I'm sure you'll find some
relevant discussions.
--
Mike.
|
|