| 
| Re: partyer, partier ??? | Very little.  Maybe some .. |  | Miss Elaine Eos (Misc@your-pants.PlayNaked.com) | 2007/01/03 08:10 |  | 
 | Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail From: Miss Elaine Eos <Misc@your-pants.PlayNaked.com>
 Newsgroups: alt.languages.english
 Subject: Re: partyer, partier ???
 Organization: Very little.  Maybe some on weekends.
 References: <4599905b$0$288$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <5b4f0$459b686b$3e18e6cb$20436@news.vispa.com>
 User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.4 (PPC Mac OS X)
 Message-ID: <Misc-3E7C97.07100103012007@newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net>
 Lines: 37
 NNTP-Posting-Host: 4.246.39.229
 X-Complaints-To: abuse@prodigy.net
 X-Trace: newssvr17.news.prodigy.net 1167836947 ST000 4.246.39.229 (Wed, 03 Jan 2007 10:09:07 EST)
 NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2007 10:09:07 EST
 X-UserInfo1: Q[RGW]OGPZWWR\@[\JJ\OPTDFZ\@@FXLM@TDOCQDJ@_@FNHB_NVUAH_[BL[\IRKIANGGJBFNJF_DOLSCENSY^U@FRFUEXR@KFXYDBPWBCDQJA@X_DCBHXR[C@\EOKCJLED_SZ@RMWYXYWE_P@\\GOIW^@SYFFSWHFIXMADO@^[ADPRPETLBJ]RDGENSKQQZN
 Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2007 07:10:01 -0800
 Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.languages.english:1378
 
 In article <5b4f0$459b686b$3e18e6cb$20436@news.vispa.com>,
 Richard Polhill <richard.news@polhill.vispa.invalid> wrote:
 
 > Simon wrote:
 > > Hi,
 > > Being that time of year I have a festive question.
 > > Both the words partyer and partier are listed by dictionary.com:
 > > http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/partier
 > >
 > > However I haven't found either of these two words in any other on-line
 > > dictionary.
 > >
 > > Does anybody know if they are american english and not british english?
 > >
 > > Happy New Year,
 > > Simon.
 
 > Hmm not sure the word exists as such but can legally be built by adding -er
 > suffix to party. Partier cannot possibly be correct, however.
 
 Are you British?  "Partier" is the common American word; "partyer" looks
 British to me.  Btw, how do you spell our word "flier" (made by adding
 "er" to "fly", after changing the Y to an I, because that's the rule
 when adding ER)?
 
 > Rather than make up words it would be better to use party-goer or reveller as
 > they carry the intended meaning.
 
 Those work, too :)
 
 Don't be too hard on the evolving language -- even the editors of OED
 recognize a dozen or two new "made-up" words as "official" every year.
 
 --
 Please take off your pants or I won't read your e-mail.
 I will not, no matter how "good" the deal, patronise any business which sends
 unsolicited commercial e-mail or that advertises in discussion newsgroups.
 
 | 
 
 
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 
 |  |