Path: news.nzbot.com!spool1.sonic-news.com!news-out.sonic-news.com!not.news-service.com!not.alt.net!not.highwinds-media.com!s02-b48!textbe01-phx!hwmnpeer02.phx!hw-filter.phx!hwmnpeer01.phx!hwmnpeer01.lga!news.highwinds-media.com!news.glorb.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!novia!novia!sequencer.newscene.com!not-for-mail
From: TonyCamonte <scar@face.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.utb.naughty-boy
Subject: Re: New Year? Pedo James Riske slurps on Kiddy Porn collected by Riske stooge nic *George Orwell*
Followup-To: alt.fan.utb.naughty-boy
Date: 4 Jan 2008 19:29:01 -0600
Organization: ValhallaCo
Lines: 170
Message-ID: <Xns9A1C18EF5852Edsfdfs@216.40.28.72>
References: <Xns9A19E278E45C1fuckfuckfuckfuckfuck@207.14.116.130> <13nq5jdvvh6bb1@news.supernews.com> <Xns9A1AA05A8F0F7fuckfuckfuckfuckfuck@207.14.116.130> <5u5fq6F1f36m8U1@mid.individual.net> <Xns9A1AE49E5BD4fuckfuckfuckfuckfuck@207.14.116.130> <5u77esF1gc4j8U1@mid.individual.net> <Xns9A1BAA7901721fuckfuckfuckfuckfuck@207.14.116.130> <goetn3lmk7h7e8s7kspgf99ns0320mgkrc@4ax.com> <ekitn39n8svt3kl47ft8dc3g5k46hdvbus@4ax.com> <5cktn3d54ij8nb9qev60fg1dd7frg8kur0@4ax.com> <jgktn3lb2v0tnr1t22er3irbre877oi9cp@4ax.com>
User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25
X-Original-Bytes: 9358
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.utb.naughty-boy:938
X-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 21:02:16 UTC (s02-b48)
news:jgktn3lb2v0tnr1t22er3irbre877oi9cp@4ax.com:
> On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 00:38:35 GMT, HMS Victor Victorian
> <VictorVictorianREMOVE@hushmail.com> wrote:
>
>><gangster@hell-flame-wars.org> wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, 04 Jan 2008 23:06:22 GMT, HMS Victor Victorian
>>><VictorVictorianREMOVE@hushmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Fri, 4 Jan 2008 22:45:29 +0000 (UTC), Frogbutt
>>>><frog@pamboisinsane.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>"dvus" <dven1@adelphia.invalid> wrote in
>>>>>news:5u77esF1gc4j8U1@mid.individual.net:
>>>>>
>>>>>> "Frogbutt" <frog@pamboisinsane.org> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:Xns9A1AE49E5BD4fuckfuckfuckfuckfuck@207.14.116.130...
>>>>>>> "dvus" <dven1@adelphia.invalid> wrote in
>>>>>>> news:5u5fq6F1f36m8U1@mid.individual.net:
>>>>>>>> "Frogbutt" <frog@pamboisinsane.org> wrote in message
>>>>>>>> news:Xns9A1AA05A8F0F7fuckfuckfuckfuckfuck@207.14.116.130...
>>>>>>>>> Brian Mailman <bmailman@sfo.invalid> wrote in
>>>>>>>>> news:13nq5jdvvh6bb1 @news.supernews.com:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Six-teen tons of greas-y grim-y pedo guts....
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> That's about what's in alt.fan.utb.naughty-boy right now. The
>>>>>>>>> tards saw the word "boy" in the group name and decided it was
>>>>>>>>> a kiddie porn froup.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Jeez! Good thing they didn't know about the game-boy group.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Doofus, you dumbfuck. That was the only group with the word
>>>>>>> "boy" in the name that the idiots hadn't found. Now there's
>>>>>>> going to be 10,000 pictures of naked little boys in it by this
>>>>>>> time tomorrow and it's all your fucking falt.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Uh, sorry, wasn't thinking straight. All that imported beer, ya
>>>>>> know...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> They had no idea what it really is. The crazy thing is that
>>>>>>>>> most of the froups they've been using for so long are dead.
>>>>>>>>> They had no reason to start spamming a new one. And now
>>>>>>>>> they're going to pay the price for trying to take one of our
>>>>>>>>> froups.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Glad I'm not them...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I don't know if you watched the first war, the one that started
>>>>>>> in alt.fan.air some years back. A bunch of hackers got in on
>>>>>>> that one and many pedos went away and never came back. It only
>>>>>>> ended when some people you don't want to fuck with asked us to
>>>>>>> step out while they did their thing. We did what we were asked
>>>>>>> to do and more pedos went away and never came back. Nobody
>>>>>>> wants a repeat of that one. It was bad. We came kind of close
>>>>>>> about three years ago though. A brain dead pedo called Rolex the
>>>>>>> Retard tried to take a group that's part of the flonk. They
>>>>>>> could have ended it with no problem. All they had to do was
>>>>>>> leave, but they decided to fight for it and more of them went
>>>>>>> away and never came back.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Interesting. Hypothetically, what sort of "things" would a
>>>>>> hypothetical hacker do to a hypothetical pedo in one of those
>>>>>> hypothetical groups? I'm assuming it'd be way above the average
>>>>>> guys pay-grade.
>>>>>
>>>>>You would assume correctly. The pedos never knew what they were
>>>>>getting hit with. The truth is, I didn't know either though. I
>>>>>never knew who the hackers were or how they were doing it. I only
>>>>>had contact with one or two of them, and that was through a third
>>>>>party and it was only once or twice in that entire year the first
>>>>>one lasted. If they had needed to get in touch with me I'm sure
>>>>>they could have at any time and with no problem. They probably
>>>>>could have called me on the phone. They were good enough that I'm
>>>>>sure they knew all my personal information or could have easily
>>>>>gotten it within a few minutes. Everybody in that war had a roll
>>>>>to play and everyone did their job well. What you saw on usenet
>>>>>was only a small part of it. It was really a very sophisticated
>>>>>operation.
>>>>>
>>>>>To understand that war you also need to understand usenet pedos.
>>>>>Most pedos hide on the net and can be very hard to find. Those
>>>>>pedos know how the net works and would never bother with usenet.
>>>>>They know it's just too easy to get caught here. The ones who do
>>>>>come to usenet are the least sophisticated of all the pedos. They
>>>>>don't understand usenet, servers, the internet, or computers. They
>>>>>know just enough to get on usenet and upload or download pictures,
>>>>>and that's all they know. If you watch their groups you'll see
>>>>>that many of them are too stupid to even figure that out. They're
>>>>>forever asking how to post or download. There are also three
>>>>>different levels of pedos on usenet. the smartest are those that
>>>>>download and never post, not even a request. It's impossible
>>>>>to know how many of those are out there, but I suspect that most of
>>>>>the pedos who come to usenet fit into that category. They only get
>>>>>caught if they take their computer in for work or if their computer
>>>>>is searched by police for some reason. The next level are the ones
>>>>>that won't post, but who ask the posters to post kp for them.
>>>>>Some of those who request are no doubt pedos, but there are other
>>>>>reasons why a person would ask a poster to post something and I
>>>>>think you can figure out a few of those reasons. The last level
>>>>>are the posters themselves. These are people who feel some strange
>>>>>need to post the stuff. I don't understand them at all. They
>>>>>would not run out onto a busy freeway, but they will post the
>>>>>most vile pictures and movies of kids being abused to usenet where
>>>>>they are sure to get caught. It must have something to do with a
>>>>>need for approval, even if that approval comes from a bunch of
>>>>>child molesters and even if that approval will cost them their
>>>>>freedom.
>>>>
>>>>A very interesting, thoughtful and well-written dissertation,
>>>>Frogbutt!
>>>>
>>>>Kudos to you, oh wise sage!
>>>>
>>>>Of course, you don't need to ASSUME that the material posted is
>>>>child pornography and therefore illegal in most venues, for unlike
>>>>brilliant trolls such as SteviePuss, you can actually SEE them.
>>>>
>>>>Not that you would download CP, certainly!
>>>>
>>>>Well! No fear of that here my dear friend. For anything posted at
>>>>the Galleries is not illegal and under any Western jurisdiction
>>>>cannot be construed as child pornography.
>>>>
>>>Really? So then there's no need for you to be anonymous, is there?
>>>Why not just host them on a website rather than try to hide in some
>>>obscure Usenet group? Oh wait....I know.....you're fulla shit.
>>>
>>>>Even by you, provided you have a modecum of legal knowledge. As for
>>>>the mysterious hackers ... I think they should be concerned about
>>>>the blatant illegality of their own actions.
>>>>
>>>>Two points to conclude.
>>>>
>>>>First, the Galleries came here originally to insult the troll
>>>>Naughty Boy, aka Charlie, aka El Trauco, aka you, dear Froggie.
>>>>Apparently the effort succeeded. Everything since then has been
>>>>gravey.
>>>>
>>>>Second, please stop posting pornography to the group. As far as I
>>>>can determine, you are the only one who does post pornography.
>>>>
>>>>You can do better.
>>>>
>>>>VV
>>>>God Save Her Majesty the Queen.
>>>>God Preserve the Prince of Wales.
>>>>Rule Britannia!
>>
>>Very simple
>>Anonymity protects people like me from people like you, Mr. "Boston
>>Blackie"
>>
> What do you think you have to fear from me? If everything is legal
> and all, I'm not stupid enough to waste my time with the likes of you.
>
> I note that you ducked the other question. Of course, that and the
> answer you did provide give me reason to speculate that you're not
> being exactly honest.
>
> Since I'm not new to all of this, I'm not going to bother to download
> any of this /legal/ stuff you put,up, but I'm sure that I'll
> eventually be able to draw a correct conclusion by other means.
is that easy to judge a person, mr blackie? you'll have to make a bigger
effort to do that
|
|