| 
 | Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail From: "Richard Forrest" <richard@plesiosaur.com>
 Newsgroups: alt.fan.uncle-davey
 Subject: Re: Corroboration
 Date: 18 Jun 2005 10:35:39 -0700
 Organization: http://groups.google.com
 Lines: 32
 Sender: news@darwin.ediacara.org
 Approved: robomod@ediacara.org
 Message-ID: <1119116139.608324.327240@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
 References: <d8vaj0$769$0@pita.alt.net> <KMGse.2745$fV.483@okepread06> <r-udnbjlBbnf1C7fRVn-2g@comcast.com> <i9Ise.2754$fV.1451@okepread06> <uridnebwTKIIyS7fRVn-3A@comcast.com> <CJIse.2758$fV.2156@okepread06> <-rednai12e2d_y7fRVn-3g@comcast.com> <dBJse.2763$fV.1683@okepread06> <glennsheldon-aLYse.25$2j1.12439@news.uswest.net>
 NNTP-Posting-Host: darwin.ediacara.org
 Mime-Version: 1.0
 X-Trace: darwin.ediacara.org 1119116120 57396 128.100.83.246 (18 Jun 2005 17:35:20 GMT)
 X-Complaints-To: usenet@darwin.ediacara.org
 NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2005 17:35:20 +0000 (UTC)
 X-NNTP-Posting-Host: 62.254.0.34
 In-Reply-To: <glennsheldon-aLYse.25$2j1.12439@news.uswest.net>
 User-Agent: G2/0.2
 Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
 Injection-Info: g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com; posting-host=62.254.0.34;posting-account=ub9dXg0AAADa4Lxy_lp2MwfC9GC5EIRa
 Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.uncle-davey:4073
 
 
 
 Glenn wrote:
 <snipped>
 
 Hey! It's Glenn again!
 Now let's get back to a question you have been very conspicuouly not
 answering:
 
 You accept that the evidence from the natural world tells us that the
 Universe is very ancient - of the order of 15 billion years - and that
 the earth is over 4 billion years old.
 
 Do you think that this is a false impression, or do you think the world
 is truly of this age?
 
 You have made it clear that you don't know why the earth has this
 appearance of age. Fine. That's an honest answer. However,  why should
 anyone believe that  the impression given by the evidence of great age
 is false?
 
 
 Now, my expectation is that you will try to change the subject, go off
 on an irrelevant tangent, resort to invective chosen from your rich
 repertoire of evasive manoevers.
 
 So why not prove me wrong, and give a straight answer to the question?
 
 Go on. Dare you.
 
 RF
 
 
 | 
 
 |