INFINITY MINUS ONE EARTHLINGS TIMELINES MUST EXIST !!
---> BIG DISCOVERY: "(INFINITY MINUS ONE) (EARTHLINGS TIMELINES) MUST EXIST
!
EXISTENCE MAY NOT EXCLUDE (INFINITY MINUS ONE) (EARTHLINGS TIMELINES)" ! <-
----
VERIFY (INFINITY MINUS ONE MUST BE A NUMBER, BECAUSE, WHETHER "INFINITY" IS
ASSIGNED IN LANGUAGE OR QUANTITY BASED UPON BELIEF AS WHETHER INFINITY EXI
STS OR NEVER EXISTS: INFINITY MINUS ONE MINUS INFINITY MINUS TWO MUST EQUAL
ONE, AND ONE MUST EXIST AS A NUMBER)
Where (infinity plus one) minus one MUST equal infinity:
Where (infinity plus one)-1=infinity MUST be true, and cannot be untrue a
nd therefore every quantities between 0 and infinity MUST be numbers as inc
luded (infinity minus one):
Therefore, (infinity minus one) must be a number!
Where (infinity minus one) cannot equal infinity:
Where infinity includes in definition "a quantity" where infinity is claime
d to be defined as a number or not a number:
Where infinity minus (infinity minus one) must be number 1, where 1 MUST be
a number, therefore (infinity minus one) MUST be a number as well.
Where the closet quantity in a number set to infinity MUST be a number beca
use the quantity the farthest from infinity MUST be a number and because as
a quantity in between farthest and closet to 0 must be a number, whereas q
uantities in between farthest and closest to infinity must include numbers
because then numbers would never exist if quantities between closet and far
thest from infinity never included numbers.
If infinity is claimed to not be a number the first number in reality close
t to infinity may be defined as (infinity minus one):
If the last number in a number set is the number before infinity MUST be tr
ue if claim infinity is not a number:
Where assumed the last number to exist is (infinity minus one) if claims in
finity doesn't exist ...
.. whether infinity is a number or never a number, (infinity minus one) mus
t be a number, because where "never real" numbers begin in claim, the numbe
r prior to "never real" numbers MUST BE a real number, even if claim infini
ty never exists ...
Then therefore (infinity minus one) must never being said as never exists!
(Infinity minus one) must exist as a number.
Then Infinity times Earthlings times timelines as "Infinity Earthlings time
lines" MUST EXIST, and may never be said doesn't exist!
Infinity-1 MUST be finite because cannot include infinity:
Where also: infinity minus one cannot be infinity and MUST be finite:
Infinity as controversy is wanted by some matematicians to exist and not ex
ist. But, at some point on number sets before claims infinity does not exis
t, must be finite. Thus, infinity minus one MUST be finite. This is derived
by theory of number substitution of physics laws by Kenneth Martin Dolan.
Also, in a universe where no true straight line exists because every point
in the universe is curved, must produce at least infinity minus one timelin
es because "Infinity minus one units (parts) of a universe" exists.
Also, in Theory of number substitution laws, if at least infinity minus one
timelines exist, then at least infinity minus one Earthling must exist
("Infinity minus one" times Earthling) plus ("Infinity minus one" times Uni
verse) plus ("Infinity minus one" times Timeline) equals Timeline + Earthli
ng + Universe "Infinity minus one", thus,
Effective January 1, 0000 until infinity:("Infinity minus one" times Earthl
ing) plus ("Infinity minus one" times Universe) plus ("Infinity minus one"
times Timeline) equals Timeline + Earthling + Universe "Infinity minus one"
, then "Infinity times Earthling" plus "Infinity times Universe" plus "Infi
nity times Timeline" equals Infinity (Timeline + Earthling + Universe)
Logic trees:
Infinity minus one which cannot be not finite.
True in existence MUST include infinity minus one timelines and infinity mi
nus one Earthlings and infinity minus one universes because untrue in exist
ence MAY NEVER include infinity minus one times (timeline plus Earthing plu
s universe), whereas therefore infinity minus one times (timeline plus Eart
hling plus universe) MUST BE TRUE THEREFORE IN EXISTENCE
Beware of people claiming to inspire intellect or information while trying
to ruin intellect or information. The information or intellect doesn't chan
ge anyway because noted as the intellect or information doesn't change befo
re or after the intellect or information displayed.
The USA and Israel and Ireland and United Kingdom and Australia and New Zea
land and Canada and Her Commonwealth of United Kingdom and entire world wid
e Christianity and The United States of America cannot win intellect in ori
gination from USA if want prone intellect to attempt false confession to ru
in the intellect. Then The USA cannot claim origination of intellect that t
hey are trying to ruin as well that Kenneth Martin Dolan didn't cause. Also
Kenneth Martin Dolan wanted through the theory of number substitution of p
hysics laws most intellect but delayed severely by attempts of ruining inte
llect that would have originated from USA, also lie detected by intellect o
bviously not classified and not sensitive as available since at least 2000
would have been obviously communicated much earlier and further verified by
any and all claims sex abnormal or sex neglect or wanting enemy of People
should have resulted in anal rape never enough wanted ended as quickly as p
ossible by doing THEY can out of laziness instead of what Kenneth Martin Do
lan can instead and curiously derivatives of only from born brain of Kennet
h Martin Dolan of Theory of Number Substitution of Physics Laws from prior
to 2000 want to include use of brain without permission of Kenneth Martin D
olan but yet claim credit of origination from brain of Kenneth Martin Dolan
belongs to them but they claim they couldn't have communicated intellect b
efore using brain of Kenneth Martin Dolan, which might include equal or hig
her intellectual quotient, but doesn't lack malintent unlike born brain of
Kenneth Martin Dolan where to determine false credit, double and more harm
to People of USA when silence and/or shush People of USA as victims of stea
ling intellect from free intellect from free Usenet (dipshit detector that
SHOULD NOT lack resign control and power including government).
In below:
"The word "number" carries some baggage with it. If $a$, $b$, and $c$ are n
umbers, and $a+c=b+c$, one expects $a=b$. For infinity, that doesn't wo
rk; under any reasonable interpretation, $1+\infty=2+\infty$, but $1\ne2$
. So while for some purposes it is useful to treat infinity as if it were a
number, it is important to remember that it won't always act the way you'v
e become accustomed to expect a number to act."
Where to prove a number:
$a+c=b+c$ ...
If a=1 b=2 c=3, then, $1+3=2+3$ should equal $1=2$, so ...
If a=1 b=2 c=infinity, then, $1+infinity=2+infinity .... but....
If a=1 b2 c=(infinity minus one), then $1+(infinity minus one)=2+(inf
inity minus one)$ ... maybe interpretated as $a=b$ !!!
https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/36289/is-infinity-a-number
|
|