"Checkmate" <LunaticFringe@The.Edge> wrote in message
news:64vnfa.qve.19.5@news.alt.net...
> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> Checkmate!
>
> First, check out what Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler said:
>
>
>>
>> On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 00:23:18 -0800, Checkmate <LunaticFringe@The.Edge>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
>> >Checkmate!
>> >
>> >First, check out what Fred Hall said:
>> >
>> >
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 20:45:56 -0800, Checkmate <LunaticFringe@The.Edge>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts
>> >> >by
>> >> >Checkmate!
>> >> >
>> >> >First, check out what Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler said:
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 12:32:29 -0500, "Sweetness"
>> >> >> <sweetchixorREMOVE@yahoo.ca> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >"Ms. Kitty" <ms@kitty.now> wrote in message
>> >> >> >news:64e56r.crg.17.1@news.alt.net...
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> "Gary Burnore" <gburnore@panix.com> wrote in message
>> >> >> >> news:k8hf6l$3u$1@reader1.panix.com...
>> >> >> >>> Ms. Kitty <ms@kitty.now> wrote:
>> >> >> >>> [snip a bunch of rethug talking points]
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> If somoene would have said this about a rethuglincan president,
>> >> >> >>> you'd be
>> >> >> >>> all over it crying how people don't respect the office of the
>> >> >> >>> president.
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> You're fucking pathetic.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Listen up, you stupid fuck! I go against the republicans as
>> >> >> >> fast as the
>> >> >> >> democrats. I am not really either party. I am just making both
>> >> >> >> be
>> >> >> >> accountable. Something you would know nothing about. . .
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IqjpG9xYjOc&feature=share
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> I have my sons in this war...are you still raping the little
>> >> >> >> girl scouts,
>> >> >> >> through your young daughter?
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >Targeting some little kid(s) now ? Nice self-spank there, asshat.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >Yeah, it doesn't get much lower, nor more clueless than that.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >Because she's clueless enough try to troll folks into feeling
>> >> >> >sorry for her,
>> >> >> >asking them to 'pray' for her.. all the while trying to start a
>> >> >> >flame war
>> >> >> >that she _lost_ in _two_ posts by lowering herself to dragging
>> >> >> >some other
>> >> >> >posters innocent "young daughter" into it.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >I hereby nominate "Lady Pilot"/"Blondie"/"Ms.
>> >> >> >Kitty"/"Checkermate"/"Ms Sir
>> >> >> >Gregory" and the rest of her socks... for the Clueless Newbie of
>> >> >> >The Month
>> >> >> >Award.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >Clueless Newbie of the Month:
>> >> >> >The Clueless Newbie of the Month (CNotM) is pretty much the same
>> >> >> >sort of
>> >> >> >thing as the KotM, but honors spectacular cluelessness on Usenet
>> >> >> >rather than
>> >> >> >Kookery.
>> >> >> >Actually being a newbie is not a strict requirement for
>> >> >> >eligibility; but the
>> >> >> >type of cluelessness being recognized needs to be of the sort
>> >> >> >typical of
>> >> >> >newbies.
>> >> >> >If someone has been on the net for some time and still acts like a
>> >> >> >newbie,
>> >> >> >they're eligible. As of March 1, 2012, this award is not
>> >> >> >repeatable.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >Seconds ?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Nomination accepted.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >Because she didn't even have the balls to be slagging another
>> >> >> >posters
>> >> >> >innocent "young daughter" using the nym that she's well _known_
>> >> >> >by.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >(What's that matter, LP. Would your "*Lady* Pilot" sock not
>> >> >> >approve of you
>> >> >> >using some little kid who is not on Usenet and has never hurt you
>> >> >> >in any
>> >> >> >fucking way, in an argument that you started and LOST within TWO
>> >> >> >posts ?)
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >Wow. Who knew that she was such a skanky lowlife. :(
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >I hereby nominate "Lady Pilot"/"Blondie"/"Ms.
>> >> >> >Kitty"/"Checkermate"/"Ms Sir
>> >> >> >Gregory" and the rest of her skanky socks... for Coward of The
>> >> >> >Month Award.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >Coward of the Month:
>> >> >> >Given to the best (as in, most noticeable) sockpuppeteer of the
>> >> >> >month.
>> >> >> >Anyone of any kind who uses a sockpuppet can get it; like the HL&S
>> >> >> >this
>> >> >> >award is not necessarily reserved for Kooks! You can nominate
>> >> >> >either the
>> >> >> >sockpuppet or if you know the real name behind it that person;
>> >> >> >either way,
>> >> >> >the sockpuppeteer gets just credit. The award is also given to
>> >> >> >people who
>> >> >> >don't follow up on threats. Or respond to hard questions. Or other
>> >> >> >cowardly
>> >> >> >acts AUK can be convinced of.
>> >> >> >Also, given to the most cowardly, yellow-bellied Usenet chicken of
>> >> >> >the
>> >> >> >month. Anyone who meets the current month's eligibility bar can
>> >> >> >get it; like
>> >> >> >the HL&S and the Palmjob Paddle, this award is not necessarily
>> >> >> >reserved for
>> >> >> >Kooks!
>> >> >> >Those who hide behind pseudoanonymous sockpuppets, to say and do
>> >> >> >things they
>> >> >> >would not normally say or do as 'themselves', usually make good
>> >> >> >candidates;
>> >> >> >you can nominate either the sockpuppet or if you know the real
>> >> >> >name behind
>> >> >> >it that person; either way, the sockpuppeteer gets just credit.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >Seconds ?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Nomination accepted.
>> >> >
>> >> >I'm gonna help Rhiannon get an award... stay tuned.
>> >>
>> >> I will. With her being part of a froup nominated for a merit award
>> >> (and I'm assuming you aren't referencing a forthcoming additional
>> >> merit award), and also nominated for a non-merit award, it could be
>> >> interesting. I'm not sure if that has ever happened in AUK.
>> >
>> >Then I think it's high time I made it happen! Clueless Newbie comes to
>> >mind...
>>
>> <puts on foam resistant suit>
>>
>> Nomination accepted. As I noted earlier, this should be interesting.
>
> Yes, those horribly mangled posts and the I-don't-give-a-fuck attitude are
> all reminiscent of 10-15 years ago when herds of Webbies came stumbling
> through Usenet in search of KP and third-grade level arguments.
>
> And do we have a second, anyone? Anyone real sweet, perhaps? <---hint
>
That would be lovely, but..
Have I missed a memo on rule changes or something ?
Far as I know, I'm not allowed to Nominate LP for CNotM -and- Second
Rhiannon for CNotM.. for the same ballot.
And you've already Seconded, or maybe Thirded... my LP nom for CNotM.
Shit, maybe I really - did- miss a memo....
If your CNotM nom for Rhiannon is for the next after next ballot, then yes,
Seconds.
<wee bit boggled>
--
Want your very own DataBasix account ?
Get one !
owner@databasix.com
May the sun always shine warmly on Fluffy and our beloved FRiEnDly
Neighborhood Vote Wrangler !
Clueless Newbie of The Month Nominee "Lady Pilot"/"Blondie"/"Ms.
Kitty"/"Checkermate"/"Ms Sir Gregory" asks people to 'pray' for her -
<64eeti.m8c.17.1@news.alt.net> - less than 3 hours after trying to target
another posters "young daughter" in an arguement that she was losing -
<64e56r.crg.17.1@news.alt.net>.
Coward of The Month Nominee "Lady Pilot"/"Blondie"/"Ms.
Kitty"/"Checkermate"/"Ms Sir Gregory" shows AUK just how _much_ of a lying
coward she is -<64qpum.hg2.17.1@news.alt.net>.
"bethbadassmiller@gmail.com" displays that she needs things "dumbed down"
for her - <d6a0b584-f79b-4a03-aa1b-329ef01adf71@googlegroups.com>.
|
|