On Mon, 10 May 2010 20:26:59 -0400, NP-f31 wrote:
>On 10 May 2010 20:10:04 GMT, boys (boys) wrote:
>
>Hello boys poster,
>
>While I appreciate the pictures you posted of beautiful boys, I don't
>appreciate the question with which they were posted. As a matter of
>fact, I don't want to fuck any of those boys. What I want to do is
>protect them from those who would attempt such a thing.
>
>If you think about it, the whole concept of your question is fucked up
>and disturbing. There are boys here, in The Fort, right now. We should
>not give them the idea that boylovers only care about their bodies. I
>don't feel that way and I happen to know that a lot, probably a
>majority of people who inhabit this group would never put selfish
>desires ahead of the welfare of a boy.
>
>So kindly change your attitude or take it with you when you go.
>
>Thank you,
>
>Doc
>NP-f31
I'm adding my vote of confidence as well!
It really irritates me when people objectify boys or when all they can
see is superficial. In the past, I've seen debates over whether boys
should have their foreskin or be cut -- and other arguments about
chubby & fat boys. All this and now this "wanna fuck these boys?" As
if boy were here for our pleasure -- when it's much more likely that
WE are HERE as their protectors and security blankets and nurturers.
I don't make any bones about the fact that I certainly fantasize about
MAKING LOVE WITH boys, but that's all about my own selfish needs when
love demands that I do what is best for my loved one -- and more often
than not, that means hands off!
It's okay if you prefer an uncircumcised boy, but do body parts or
bodily characteristics really mean anything in the grand scheme of
what we ought to be doing: providing a boy with love and nurturing
and protection? And guess what? Fat boys need that, too.
-- 4s00th@hushmail.com
If you send email, I will reply to it here at asbl
(without showing your email addy)
unless you ask me not to.
|
|
.jpeg (1/1)')){kind=link}