On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 14:27:11 -0700, C'0-SM-oS, wrote
(in article <4ba9322e$0$14117$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com>):
> insane for boys! wrote in
> news:4ba828be$0$10524$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com:
>
>> On 2010-03-22 01:15:18 -0500, Morpheus <Morpheus@dreamland.com> said:
>>
>>> On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 18:50:00 -0700, insane for boys! wrote
>>> (in article <4ba6ccc8$0$9197$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com>):
>>>
>>>> On 2010-03-20 17:34:50 -0500, "_C'0-SM-oS," <oezse@sats.com> said:
>>>>
>>>>> insane for boys! wrote in
>>>>> news:4ba535fc$0$19029$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2010-03-19 23:32:43 -0500, "Dexter" <Dexter@DarkPassenger.com>
>>>>>> said:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It would be nice but you take what you can get,,,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Dexter
>>>>>>
>>>>>> About the 2 replies, that is very true. And thank you Dexter SO
>>>>>> VERY much for posting the Jimmy sets!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> Well I think the Jimmy site is sailing about as close as they can
>>>>> with the last few sets and even have a hunch that the last may have
>>>>> pushed the boat out a little further now he had turned sixteen when
>>>>> the shots were made.
>>>>>
>>>>> cosmos
>>>>
>>>> How do you know what his age is?
>>>>
>>>
>>> What a silly question.
>>
>> Why is that a silly question? Cosmos claims to know Jimmy's age. I'm
>> wondering how he knows what it is.
>>
>>>
> Hi IFB
> I think Morph felt I would be to shy to answer!
>
> Very shrewd of you to beware of what may be false information,
>
> Always treat all you encounter on Usenet as potential LEA and act
> accordingly, after all you never really know whom it is you are talking
> to today, and even if you think you know who it was yesterday, that's not
> a guarantee for tomorrow.
>
> Some of the things I said such as dates a few of the photos were made can
> be verified from meta data!
>
> All digital cameras implant text data within the picture file, such as
> Date, time, make of camera and serial number, most studios in our arena
> tend to delete this info as part of good housekeeping, however. Deleting
> and erasing the data are different, forensic techniques are always
> advancing,
> It's now even possible to write your own spoof data.
>
> A year or two ago some fine fellow obtained a copy of the latest Harry
> Potter Book (he was employed by the publishing company) and posted fine
> JPEG's of all the pages on the web only it was 3 months before
> publication was due, he was caught when he police cross checked the
> camera serial number against the guarantee registers of the camera
> manufacturer
>
> Cosmos npf49
>
> Nothing claimed everything is denied
>
>
I thought it was a silly question because the questioner is essentially
asking the respondent to compromise his own security.
Why would anyone want to do that?
Second what if the respondent says, "Model X is 14 years old". Does that
mean Model X is 14? Far from it. This is the internet. Anyone can say
anything. Anyone can make any claim.
I could for example say that Y-Not is alive and well and posting in the
groups under a number of different nics.
In reality, I have no idea what the old son of a bitch is up to....
:)
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
|