On Sat, 9 Jan 2010 13:50:01 -0800, Grant. wrote
(in article <Grant-me-that-0101101@Grant.Grant>):
> In article <hc7fk5hqtn83vs781f0sbiil8k2mgbil9f@4ax.com>, NP-f31 wrote:
>
>> On 08 Jan 2010 18:20:38 GMT, boys2010@hushmail.com
>> (boys2010@hushmail.com) wrote:
>>
>> Hi Boys 2010,
>>
>> Thank you for posting the photos of the handsome young man. These
>> photos are not 'pedo' nor are they PTHC. They are photos of a very
>> handsome young man and were obviously taken by someone he trusts.
>> Why do you advetise them as PTHC? Is this to imply that there are
>> others that you have that feature this boy in a completely different
>> light? Soliciting e-mails from others to share such photos is an
>> extremely dangerous way to share. You never know who is on the other
>> end of that e-mail, it might be someone who shares your interests or
>> it may be someone who would want to persecute you for your interests.
>>
>> That being said, it is also entirely possible that YOU are an agent of
>> law enforcement who is attempting to entrap newbies and people who
>> don't know any better. With that being a possibility, I'm cautioning
>> everyone who sees your post to ignore the tease and stay safe because
>> THEY don't know who's on the other end of that e-mail.
>>
>> Now, if you're really interested in sharing, then I suggest that you
>> continue to post your photos in zip files as you have these. This will
>> give you some anonymity and allow others to download in anonymity too.
>> You might even try using passwords as some of the other posters do.
>> But PLEASE do not solicit e-mails from strangers, it is unsafe for
>> all.
>>
>> Stay Safe,
>>
>> Doc
>> NP-f31
>
> Good post. I agree.
> It looks like you might not get noticed among all the other posts so
> I'm replying to you to make a thread to get noticed more.
>
>
Right
|
|