In article <0001HW.C70BB33B00278972B02919BF@news.newscene.com>,
Morpheus <Morpheus@dreamland.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 15:08:23 -0700, Mover wrote
> (in article <261020091808232835%Mover@Watch-Me.com>):
>
> > In article <0001HW.C70A8A2C00132621B02919BF@news.newscene.com>,
> > Morpheus <Morpheus@dreamland.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On Sat, 24 Oct 2009 05:30:39 -0700, Fort Babysitter wrote
> >> (in article <4uOdnYDRoYPsbn_XnZ2dnUVZ_qWdnZ2d@giganews.com>):
> >>
> >>> A small bit of Y-Not profile
> >>> ===================
> >>> This post discusses a few of the small bits of
> >>> Y-Not and the small Y-Not's moronic presence
> >>> on Usenet.
> >>> ++
> >>> After repeatedly attempting to compete with
> >>> KidHacker for a presence in the Fort and upon
> >>> miserably failing, Y-Not started resorting to using
> >>> tricks that Y-Not thought were clever. And again
> >>> Y-Not failed miserably. Y-Not was Usenet castrated
> >>> in the Fort.
> >>> ++
> >>> The Usenet castration of Y-Not drove the small
> >>> bit Y-Not into a deep and torturous mind set. And
> >>> deep down within and into his insane real self. After
> >>> being Usenet castrated in the Fort, Y-Not could never
> >>> again use his little and pitiful Y-Not nic. And he never has.
> >>> ++
> >>> The small and little Y-Not's presence on Usenet is
> >>> now from the real and true Y-Not. Y-Not's presence
> >>> on Usenet is from a moronic coward that is hiding behind
> >>> anything that he can find.
> >>>
> >>> Fort Babysitter
> >>>
> >>
> >> Geeeze. Maybe you're not that crazy after all....
> >>
> >> When Doc was 'outed' my theory is he went to ground and Y-Not took over
> >> his
> >> identity and has been posting as him since.
> >>
> >
> > That's interesting! LOL
> >
> > But how did he get the password to Doc's hushmail account?
> > And, would Y Not as Doc do some really stupid things no one who's been
> > accused of Y Not ever did so bad? I don't think so. Would Y Not ever
> > attack Grant? No. Would Grant attack Y Not as Doc, even criticize him?
> > Impossible! LOL
> > I see the same Doc here who attacked Y Not so hysterically in the past,
> > who still can't stop accusing people who criticize him of being Y Not.
> > I see the same Doc who tries to split up friends and supporters of
> > people he fights with, and tries to manipulate them to attack who he
> > wants. I see the same Doc who uses personal info to attack people, and
> > never apologizes for all the wrong he does.
> > There IS a difference, however, in this new Doc (since just before Y
> > Not left), and the old; sometimes he tries to not do these bad things.
> > Sometimes he remembers that fighting here serves no GOOD purpose.
> > Sometimes he remembers to be a better man. Then he is accused of being
> > that ultimate better man, in the eyes of some, Y Not, his former arch
> > enemy, the stoic target of resentment and hate of all the fragile
> > paranoid egos who ever inhabited the Fort. He can't win! LOL
> >
> > From my viewpoint, the old simpler Doc was more fun to play with. This
> > new Doc requires a little more work, but I'll live with it. LOL
> >
> > Mover
> >
> > Ps He's never going to like me. LOL
> > That's alright. I never wanted to lick boots anyway. I wonder what kind
> > of Polish he uses. Hungarian? LOL
>
> That certainly is an interesting (amusing even) version of events. Would
> Grant attack Y-Not?? Ha the puppets act out the play dictated by the
> pulling of the strings.
I don't see strings. Nothing to gain by them. Results don't show
evidence of useful purpose. Therefore, you should check your delusion
for more justification, or Occam's Razor could slice your head off. LOL
> The new 'voice' of Doc is different. It's obvious to anyone who has followed
> your dialogue with him in the past
What dialog? He doesn't go out of his way to reply to me. I don't ask
for it, either.
> Even you admit his style has changed. Of course. It isn't that Doc.
Changing styles doesn't have to mean different people, Duey. LOL
Quack! Quack! Quack! Quack! Quack! Quack! Quack! LOL
Doc was much nicer before you showed up at the Fort (he loved Y Not),
then he changed to fanatic combatant. Then he changed to being nice,
and pulled you into his attack he started again (this is the Doc you
fixated on, just as he intended), then he went nice (you were disgusted
with him for that), and then attacked again (ah, he's right again),
then he went nice (the traitor was lost to you), and then... You should
get the idea. All through this he was still the same person. He keeps
changing back and forth, like he was into a fifth. A whole case, a
whole brewery of it! LOL
Which is the REAL Doc? There isn't one. Never was. Because HE doesn't
know.
Very young children can form Attachment Disorders when their parent(s)
change their behavior patterns significantly, after the child has
formed a fixed association for the parent(s) previous behavior pattern.
In their simple logic, "parent = this". Parent does not do this but
does that = "not parent". When they become older, and don't realize
where their feeling of family alienation comes from, they sometimes
form a fantasy of being adopted to explain it. Some children go so far
as to believe their parent has been abducted and replaced by an alien.
This could be your problem. You need Doc to be one way you've fixated
on. When he isn't, to you he can't be Doc, so he must have been
replaced by the very alien Y Not.
Now are you sure you want to be prancing about around here being the
poster CHILD of such a juvenile psychological disorder? I hope not! LOL
> "...the stoic target of resentment and hate of all the fragile egos who ever
> inhabited the fort..." Wow. If I din't know you were kidding, I'd think you
> were delusional.
>
> But you're not.
But I was. LOL
Obvious exaggeration can be a form of humor, right?
But you didn't want to see it that way. Now who's delusional? LOL
> More of a sociopath.
More of nothing but me. LOL
Sorry, there's no evidence of my being a sociopath in any of my posts.
So far. LOL
Nor in yours. Or, possibly surprisingly enough, in lookin's.
In fact, I don't see how there could be, in the fantom partial entities
we create to show of ourselves in what we chose to post.
> LOL
>
Why should I post something you would agree with, to YOU? Where would
be the fun in that? LOL
I don't think what I posted about psychological things is new to you or
to other people here (lots of people here know about psychology), so
don't go calling me Y Not because of that. Pick a different, better,
reason, if you have to use that old attack tactic that DOC invented for
you. LOL
Oh, didn't he once (or twice?) call YOU Y Not? LOL
If you have any more buttons I haven't pushed yet, please let me know
about them. I'd be much obliged. LOL
Mover
|
|