On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 15:58:01 -0700, Grant wrote
(in article <Grant-me-that-3108091@Grant.Grant>):
> In article <0017da07$0$11380$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com>, Pig Castrator
> Hatchet Mus.cled George <PigCastrator@SlaughterHouse.com> wrote:
>
>> Doc NP-f31 is a fraud
>
> He might be some way (LOL) but I don't think so about this.
>
>> =================================
>> I'm done with attempting to deal with the old
>> hen chicken Doc like KidHacker did when KH was
>> still posting to the Fort. Where KH would recognize
>> the dimwit posts of Doc with humor. Where KH
>> would recognize the nothingness of Doc's contributions
>> to the Fort with, "Oh well."
>>
>> Without KidHacker being present, this dimwit Doc
>> might even be thinking that Doc is the new KH!
>
> Nobody can equal KH or Y Not or The Lookout about security but those
> people gave Doc their information so he could post it for us when they
> aren't here. I know this because I arranged it. I got the idea while
> emailing with The Wiz a few years ago. Thats when we started the Fort
> FAQ Project.
>
>>>> with the fraud authority of NP badge assigner,
>
> Tommy agrees with Wizs choice of successor so its official.
>
>>>> with the fraud posting of NP Cultist propaganda,
>>
>>>> with the directives posting of telling Fort visitors
>> what they can and cannot do.
>
> Its advice. I realize hes not as good a writer as the experts I wrote
> above but at least hes trying. Why not cut him some slack?
>
>> From now on, I will post to every dimwit post that
>> the old hen chicken Doc NP-f31 makes to the Fort.
>>
>> Pig Castrator Hatchet Mus.cled George
>>
>
>
> I don't mean to burst your defensive bubble too much but Doc is right
> in theory. There isn't any way for him to tell what an internet link
> really points to (and it can change in seconds) without going there and
> he thought that the risk was too great for that. You are asking us to
> trust you in three ways. That you are perfect and never make mistakes
> about this (is anybody really?) and that the address wasn't highjacked
> by somebody who hates us after you went there and one real big issue
> that it wasn't posted by an impersonator. Remember its happened to you
> before.
>
> I believe you mean the fort and its people well and wouldn't do
> anything real to hurt us but we have to be very cautions because we
> can't really know whats at the other end of a link no matter how
> trustworthy the person who posts it until its too late.
> I'm sorry you feel bad about what Doc posted about this but I think he
> is right to warn people about the *possible* dangers. I hope you think
> so too.
>
> I think Doc meant well and didn't post to insult you but as a security
> service for us all. I think people who do that should be supported even
> if we disagree with them. Its too serious to fight about. We *have* to
> get along here and look out for each other in the only place where we
> can be ourselves without getting jailed or killed. Where else can we?
>
>
Ah yes, the elusive Tommy....
|
|