Path: news.nzbot.com!spool1.sonic-news.com!news-out.sonic-news.com!iad.highwinds-media.com!feeder.news-service.com!news.alt.net!fictitious-path
From: Tedn'Alice@BLDL.com
Newsgroups: alt.fan.prettyboy
Subject: Re: A Friendly Warning to astraweb users
Organization: BLDL
Message-ID: <i75md49jle5045api8e4mefrt6fntgankp@4ax.com>
References: <pb16d4to8aluovfhfr7fkgntts61b1ksag@4ax.com> <Xns9B1E86ABBD560utb@208.90.168.18> <Xns99B0BABCF6DF4mailmailcom@216.40.28.76> <t9m8d41hbrc8p03icqhgnpvfihgrgmpas1@4ax.com> <f4pfd4lthr81k66pn8qo7oh4p9kv81leu5@4ax.com> <khsgd4t7a3odojh7dcg5hhfkfbk5g3rh7p@4ax.com> <Xns9B229D9E0893Autb@208.90.168.18> <n76jd4hp1n7872m9cjmcsf8njofq0ceokh@4ax.com> <Xns9B239166A64F5utb@208.90.168.18> <Xns9B237EDC78B2fort6789@216.151.153.14> <0001HW.C5005E74001CD7BAB01AD9AF@news.newscene.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 48
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 04:42:39 GMT
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.prettyboy:3597
On 24 Sep 2008 23:19:03 -0500, Morpheus <Morpheus@dreamland.com>
wrote:
>> If you fail to understand two English words strung together, then
>>> that's your problem. Basically it means that even if a child could
>>> consent to anything, do they know the full consequences of what they
>>> are agreeing to
Right.
So yer concept of "informed consent" implies that kids can consent, or
you wouldn't have made the distinction, Professor NB?
Get your story straight.
Now if ye admit that kids can give that kind of consent, then yer
saying that the posting of any pictures of kids on the web requires
this kind of consent? Right?
Okay, so the seenario is this--you take some pix and before you post
'em, you've got to inform the kids about the "full consequences of
what they're agreeing to." Gee, I suspect that'd take a hell of alot
of paper ... I mean to cover all contingencies.
Now what, in your twisted little mind, might be those "full
consequences?" Have you any idea? Probly not. Anyone with a thimble
full of sense (just roughly more than you got) can see all kinds of
problems with that.
Now if yer referring to certain TYPES of pictures, such as nudes, for
example, or skimpy speedos, or boys in baggy pants holding their arms
over their heads--anything "suggestive", how does that change the
equation? What about archival pictures from the 19th century--Von
Gloeden, for example? Do you hold a fucking sceance?
You probably mean the pictures you've seen posted here, maybe?
Oh, that's right. You've never actually seen any of them, have you?
Of course, you'll deny your complete ignorance and assert your
assumptions as fact--because it is convenient.
You're pathetic and, as usual, full of shite. Find a new tack.
TnA
Law that is Unjust is not Law.
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 |
|