Path: news.nzbot.com!spool1.sonic-news.com!news-out.sonic-news.com!iad.highwinds-media.com!feeder.news-service.com!news.alt.net!fictitious-path
From: 4s00th <4s00th@hushmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.prettyboy
Subject: Re: A Friendly Warning to astraweb users
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 05:33:29 -0400
Message-ID: <a92kd4hfkqbsmd56lgah50ovogtdhved7t@4ax.com>
References: <8kn3d4tv8njoqvi4f778d817gdc7hntq3s@4ax.com> <Xns9B1E55B79328Butb@208.90.168.18> <pb16d4to8aluovfhfr7fkgntts61b1ksag@4ax.com> <Xns9B1E86ABBD560utb@208.90.168.18> <Xns99B0BABCF6DF4mailmailcom@216.40.28.76> <t9m8d41hbrc8p03icqhgnpvfihgrgmpas1@4ax.com> <f4pfd4lthr81k66pn8qo7oh4p9kv81leu5@4ax.com> <khsgd4t7a3odojh7dcg5hhfkfbk5g3rh7p@4ax.com> <Xns9B229D9E0893Autb@208.90.168.18> <s6jid4tg6j1hdp2lnhohti3ua6n0jevaat@4ax.com> <Xns9B2356A00E7ECutb@208.90.168.18>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1117
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 228
Organization: Unlimited download news at news.astraweb.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 8958a0bb.news.astraweb.com
X-Trace: DXC=1;Z`S2ne@E=JQj]j1AWO\;L?0kYOcDh@:Dc?0<1MH?29U51X]ZJ1CU?khL]9:0kZ^2EVenH:MN@`?>VBoG[f89l7
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.prettyboy:3590
On Tue, 23 Sep 2008 22:30:56 +0000 (UTC), Naughty Boy <naughtynaughty>
wrote:
>4s00th <4s00th@hushmail.com> wrote in
>news:s6jid4tg6j1hdp2lnhohti3ua6n0jevaat@4ax.com:
>
>> On Tue, 23 Sep 2008 05:29:40 +0000 (UTC), Naughty Boy <naughtynaughty>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>Tedn'Alice@BLDL.com wrote in
>>>news:khsgd4t7a3odojh7dcg5hhfkfbk5g3rh7p@4ax.com:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 14:40:50 -0400, 4s00th <4s00th@hushmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Sat, 20 Sep 2008 02:01:19 GMT, Tedn'Alice@BLDL.com wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On 19 Sep 2008 11:23:01 -0500, Jerry <mail@mail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Naughty Boy <naughtynaughty> wrote in news:Xns9B1E86ABBD560utb@
>>>>>>>208.90.168.18:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Tedn'Alice@BLDL.com wrote in
>>>>>>>> news:pb16d4to8aluovfhfr7fkgntts61b1ksag@4ax.com:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 22:25:35 +0000 (UTC), Naughty Boy
>>>>>>><naughtynaughty>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Tedn'Alice@BLDL.com wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>news:8kn3d4tv8njoqvi4f778d817gdc7hntq3s@4ax.com:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 00:29:09 +0000 (UTC), Naughty Boy
>>>>>>><naughtynaughty>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Vlad-The-Impaler <me-again@wombledown.net> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>>news:thi1d4t2edbfd0hl607djijauflrc8phee@4ax.com:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 17 Sep 2008 01:50:50 +0200 (CEST), jeanpauljesus
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <jeanpauljesus@heaven.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Have to agree with Vlad there.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>I'm always amazed how otherwise rational people cannot see
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>that resources devoted to chasing what should be low priority
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>bogies
>>>>>>>are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>resources that cannot be spent on truly high priority issues.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>The reason they cannot see this is because their claims to
>>>>>>>"protect"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>children in this way are - whether they are aware of this or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>not, usually not - actually come from their arbitrary
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>morality and
>>>>>>>terror
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>about sex and sexuality, and not so much from rational
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>analysis
>>>>>>>of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>actual risks to children, especially in the case of boys.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Yet pedophiles are the ones who are supposed to exhibit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>"cognitive distortion" (!).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>And of course, we have seen research that questions the
>>>>>>>assumptions
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>and claims of the CA industry censured and its authors
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>professionally ostracized - that's where such research isn't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>outright buried to begin with, that is. Why bother listening
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>to that which you don't agree with?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>The assumption that photographing a child nude will "harm"
>>>>>>>children
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>is a case in point. That assumption has been extended by the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>CA Industry to include a whole range of images that, until a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>few
>>>>>>>years
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>ago, were never seen as "indecent" at all. It's arbitrary,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>and entirely culturally determined.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>But you're wasting your time Vlad on NB - he's just a troll
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>and
>>>>>>>just
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>spews whatever. I never read his posts.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Aye, jpj, he's an ineffectual jackanapes, to be sure.
>>>>>>>inordinately
>>>>>>>>>>>>> impressed with his own inadaquacies, so insignificant that
>>>>>>>>>>>>> his significance no longer signifies A village somewhere has
>>>>>>>>>>>>> clearly mislaid its resident idiot. But amuses me, watching
>>>>>>>>>>>>> him squawking away on his bouncy ball. Does he pass this way
>>>>>>>>>>>>> often, or is he
>>>>>>>just
>>>>>>>>>>>>> out on day release, like?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vlad
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Still stung that I called you out on snipping this, huh?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>"I said you are a bunch of fucking hypocrites who profess to
>>>>>>>>>>>>love
>>>>>>>and
>>>>>>>>>>>>presumably respect boys yet keep posting and downloading their
>>>>>>>>>>>>pics without their informed consent."
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Gawd, but you're boring.
>>>>>>>>>>> Get a new line. Get a new life.
>>>>>>>>>>> Aren't your "thirty minutes online" up yet?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Get fucked, you lying, impotent limp dick.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>What are you upset about? Have you ever stopped to think why you
>>>>>>>>>>are sexually attracted to young boys?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Sure.
>>>>>>>>> I hate fuckers like you.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I did as a kid,
>>>>>>>>> And I do now.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Have a noice day.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It's a bit sad when you still haven't got over your mistreatment
>>>>>>>> as a
>>>>>>>lad
>>>>>>>> when you are well into your 50's. Is that what makes you scared of
>>>>>>>adult
>>>>>>>> relationships?
>>>>>
>>>>>You know, if that's his attitude, then you'd expect that he has no
>>>>>problem with kiddie-fuckers -- after all, it's sad that they can't get
>>>>>over any mistreatment as a lad. He can't even be consistent in his
>>>>>ignorance!
>>>>>
>>>>>>>another improvised shrink, greaty!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>LOL
>>>>>>
>>>>>>NB seems to think I'm scared of adult relationships.
>>>>>>Seems he thinks fucking women defines a complete adult relationship.
>>>>>>Pretty narrow point of view, ain't it?
>>>>>>How'd ya like to be married to that kind of bloke?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>With all the time he spends in the boy groups, I think he either
>>>>>>ain't gettin' any or he's got some deep-seated psychological issues,
>>>>>>like his uncle diddling him when he was five.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>And he never really got over it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Whaddya think?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Maybe both, eh?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>So tell me NB ... this all just self-righteous outrage, or did
>>>>>>someone slip you one in the bath?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>TnA
>>>>>
>>>>>Now, now, you know his answer -- he'll accuse you of projecting your
>>>>>own experiences on him! It sure is funny how a little knowledge of a
>>>>>simple defense mechanism makes one feel like a shrink!
>>>>>
>>>>>But I have to wonder why you keep playing with him -- we've already
>>>>>proven he's nothing more than a brain-dead bigot who only bothers
>>>>>because he needs to look down on someone to compensate for his own
>>>>>inferiority. He doesn't give a damn about kids -- he just wants to
>>>>>hurt others, and he can't understand why people follow any kind of
>>>>>rules when it's so obvious that no one can enforce those rules on the
>>>>>Internet. He just can't get it into his head that some people choose
>>>>>to do the right thing just because it's the right thing to do (read:
>>>>>moral development of a 5-year-old).
>>>>>
>>>>>So why do you continue to tease someone who's so clearly deficient in
>>>>>intelligence, self-esteem and moral development?
>>>>>
>>>>>-- 4s00th@hushmail.com
>>>>>
>>>>>If you send email, I will reply to it here at asbl
>>>>>(without showing your email addy)
>>>>>unless you ask me not to.
>>>>
>>>> Reason?
>>>> Entertainment.
>>>> The same reason kids poke at a mad pitbull through the fence slats.
>>>> Listen to him fly into a frothing fit.
>>>>
>>>> Beats the hell out of the tellie, I can tell you!
>>>
>>>Frothing fit? Is that how you see it? I must watch my prose more
>>>carefully. All I mean to do is point out the hypocrisy of those who are
>>>supposed "boylovers", and then post boys pics all over Usenet for
>>>pedophiles sexual satisfaction without any regard to those boy's
>>>feelings.
>>
>> If that was what you were doing, then I might actually applaud your
>> efforts -- you have stated a genuine problem in the boy-love
>> community: those who claim to love, but only serve lust.
>>
>> Sharing pictures is not so much of a problem -- though I freely admit
>> that there is no way in hell that _I_ would post pix of someone I love
>> in a place where those lusters can slaver over them -- well, certainly
>> not pictures of an intimate nature. But for the most part, we share
>> pictures here that we've found -- usually on the Internet.
>>
>> But the truth of the matter is that you do NOT generally point out
>> such problems -- you spread your hatred and foment more hatred all
>> based on your own bigoted ideas of what we are and what you think we
>> do.
>>
>> Let me ask you, if I didn't love the boys I so admire, what would keep
>> me from going out and using them as I saw fit? Fear of punishment? We
>> all know that people who commit crimes believe that they will not get
>> caught, so the threat of punishment is non-existent. You're right that
>> there are a lot of people who claim "love" when they actually have no
>> idea what the word means. But for those of us who do understand -- it
>> is that very love that you mock that makes us choose to ignore our own
>> desires and needs.
>
>Love? Don't make me laugh.
I apologize. It was never my intention to use words beyond your
understanding.
-- 4s00th@hushmail.com
If you send email, I will reply to it here at asbl
(without showing your email addy)
unless you ask me not to.
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 |
|