Tedn'Alice@BLDL.com wrote in news:t9m8d41hbrc8p03icqhgnpvfihgrgmpas1@
4ax.com:
> On 19 Sep 2008 11:23:01 -0500, Jerry <mail@mail.com> wrote:
>
>>Naughty Boy <naughtynaughty> wrote in news:Xns9B1E86ABBD560utb@
>>208.90.168.18:
>>
>>> Tedn'Alice@BLDL.com wrote in
>>> news:pb16d4to8aluovfhfr7fkgntts61b1ksag@4ax.com:
>>>
>>>> On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 22:25:35 +0000 (UTC), Naughty Boy
>><naughtynaughty>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Tedn'Alice@BLDL.com wrote in
>>>>>news:8kn3d4tv8njoqvi4f778d817gdc7hntq3s@4ax.com:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 00:29:09 +0000 (UTC), Naughty Boy
>><naughtynaughty>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Vlad-The-Impaler <me-again@wombledown.net> wrote in
>>>>>>>news:thi1d4t2edbfd0hl607djijauflrc8phee@4ax.com:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Wed, 17 Sep 2008 01:50:50 +0200 (CEST), jeanpauljesus
>>>>>>>> <jeanpauljesus@heaven.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Have to agree with Vlad there.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>I'm always amazed how otherwise rational people cannot see that
>>>>>>>>>resources devoted to chasing what should be low priority bogies
>>are
>>>>>>>>>resources that cannot be spent on truly high priority issues.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>The reason they cannot see this is because their claims to
>>"protect"
>>>>>>>>>children in this way are - whether they are aware of this or not,
>>>>>>>>>usually not - actually come from their arbitrary morality and
>>terror
>>>>>>>>>about sex and sexuality, and not so much from rational analysis
>>of
>>>>>>>>>actual risks to children, especially in the case of boys. Yet
>>>>>>>>>pedophiles are the ones who are supposed to exhibit "cognitive
>>>>>>>>>distortion" (!).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>And of course, we have seen research that questions the
>>assumptions
>>>>>>>>>and claims of the CA industry censured and its authors
>>>>>>>>>professionally ostracized - that's where such research isn't
>>>>>>>>>outright buried to begin with, that is. Why bother listening to
>>>>>>>>>that which you don't agree with?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>The assumption that photographing a child nude will "harm"
>>children
>>>>>>>>>is a case in point. That assumption has been extended by the CA
>>>>>>>>>Industry to include a whole range of images that, until a few
>>years
>>>>>>>>>ago, were never seen as "indecent" at all. It's arbitrary, and
>>>>>>>>>entirely culturally determined.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>But you're wasting your time Vlad on NB - he's just a troll and
>>just
>>>>>>>>>spews whatever. I never read his posts.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Aye, jpj, he's an ineffectual jackanapes, to be sure.
>>inordinately
>>>>>>>> impressed with his own inadaquacies, so insignificant that his
>>>>>>>> significance no longer signifies A village somewhere has clearly
>>>>>>>> mislaid its resident idiot. But amuses me, watching him squawking
>>>>>>>> away on his bouncy ball. Does he pass this way often, or is he
>>just
>>>>>>>> out on day release, like?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Vlad
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Still stung that I called you out on snipping this, huh?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>"I said you are a bunch of fucking hypocrites who profess to love
>>and
>>>>>>>presumably respect boys yet keep posting and downloading their pics
>>>>>>>without their informed consent."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Gawd, but you're boring.
>>>>>> Get a new line. Get a new life.
>>>>>> Aren't your "thirty minutes online" up yet?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Get fucked, you lying, impotent limp dick.
>>>>>
>>>>>What are you upset about? Have you ever stopped to think why you are
>>>>>sexually attracted to young boys?
>>>>
>>>> Sure.
>>>> I hate fuckers like you.
>>>>
>>>> I did as a kid,
>>>> And I do now.
>>>>
>>>> Have a noice day.
>>>
>>> It's a bit sad when you still haven't got over your mistreatment as a
>>lad
>>> when you are well into your 50's. Is that what makes you scared of
>>adult
>>> relationships?
>>
>>
>>another improvised shrink, greaty!
>
> LOL
>
> NB seems to think I'm scared of adult relationships.
> Seems he thinks fucking women defines a complete adult relationship.
Please provide a message ID where I said that. You can't? Really?
> Pretty narrow point of view, ain't it?
> How'd ya like to be married to that kind of bloke?
>
> With all the time he spends in the boy groups, I think he either ain't
> gettin' any or he's got some deep-seated psychological issues, like
> his uncle diddling him when he was five.
>
> And he never really got over it.
>
> Whaddya think?
>
> Maybe both, eh?
>
> So tell me NB ... this all just self-righteous outrage, or did someone
> slip you one in the bath?
You do have some sick fantasies, don't you? Why are you projecting? Have
you thought about getting help for that?
--
Look at that. The one, the only, the original, the stupid Naughty Boy is
back. Who said Usenet couldn't go further downhill?
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 |
|