NP-f31 wrote in news:q5k6b6d942su8t51aqrl17je37hsp5qpem@4ax.com:
> On 10 Oct 2010 08:02:01 -0500, Charles Calthrop <chacal@th.com> wrote:
>
>>NP-f31 wrote in news:0hqha696gge077v2q7lacbofner2qeskd6@4ax.com:
>>
>>> On Fri, 1 Oct 2010 11:43:42 +0000 (UTC), Anonymous
>>> <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Hairy Dude, this boy wrote to you in one of these forums, asking
>>>>your help in participating more fully in what they had to offer. Two
>>>>months later, my Hushmail Inbox is still empty of your reply.
>>>
>>> Hello M.O.
>>>
>>> Never saw it apparently. Typically the only time you post is to
>>> complain about me. Sorry you don't have something more contructive
>>> to occupy your time.
>>
>>
>> Hehe, yet again my loving pair of fellas reunite, what a joy to see
>> you
>>here, Dog the shepard, and Mob the lost child!
>> But my dear Mob, don't you get tired of chewing one more time the
>> same
>>rotten bite? Yes or not, you certainly tires me out, and I advise you
>>that your speech is everything but impressive.
>> And why are you so angry with here my friend Dog? Can't you see he is
>> a
>>good, not, an excelent person? If not, look at him fairly, telling
>>which is right and which is not with unbreakable determination. Can't
>>you recognise a leader on him?
>> But in addition to this you must know, my dear friends, that there is
>> a
>>difference between a leader and a preacher, cause the former is raised
>>by the community and the last one is just a product of an excessive
>>self- esteem. So, what do you say about it, my loving Dog, are you
>>'proud' to be a christian? I know you are, pride is the stuff that
>>idiots are made of.
>> And in this sense, I must 'confess', my dear 'brothers', and with
>> certain
>>humor, that I recognise in old Dog not a leader but an unbeatable and
>>metonymic paradigm of this chilling country called the USA. I mean, an
>>enormous, clumsy, posh, conceited, christian, family yokel trying to
>>patronize the whole world with the most hollow values. It is funny,
>>isn't it? What do you say about it, Y-nuts? FUNFUNFUN?
>>
>>
>> Undoubtly the worst thing about the 'boylover world' is trying to
>> disguise
>>pedophilia under a cloak of social aceptation, adorning then this
>>condition with the most imminent 'human' values (commonly religious
>>values like charity). Contrary to what a place like this might think,
>>this conduct is absolutely pejorative toward people like us, cause
>>talks about personal rejection. And these are wise words, which you'll
>>miss here at Church.
>>
>> Love and hugs.
>
>
> Hi Charlie Chuck.
>
> What does religion have to do with anything? Aside from religion. You
> ask if I'm proud to be a Christian. That's none of your business.
> Notice how I do not ask you about yours. However, if you've ever paid
> attention to anything I've written on the subject you already know
> that I am more about belief than religion. Belief is personal,
> religion is political and therefore poison in my opinion. I would much
> rather be Christ-like than Christian and I try to be.
>
> As for attempting to disguise pedophilia under a cloak of social
> acceptance, that is an excellent point. What I do with boys when I am
> in contact with them is build them up and give them a reason not to
> hate people like us. What is it that you do with boys?
>
> It's easy to sit back, poke fun, tear someone down and not express
> your own views. But unless you take a stand for something, like I try
> to do, what value is there in your complaining about those who try?
> It's been awhile since I posted to MagOb asking the same questions,
> and he is either ignoring me or has no answer. I expect I'll get the
> same from you.
I agree with you, my dear Dog
|
|