On 31 May 2006 20:07:49 -0700, "Strife767" <strife767@gmail.com>
wrote:
>
>Bitchin' Bonney wrote:
>> On Mon, 29 May 2006 16:48:24 GMT, Katie Lynn <KLynnMD@StUltansHosp.ie>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >
>> >Andrealphus wrote:
>> >
>> >> In News 1148870053.914375.74850@g10g2000cwb.googlegroups.com,, bobandcarole
>> >> at bobandcarole222@hotmail.com, typed this:
>> >>
>> >> > Want the truth faggot?
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> You're a lying sack of shit, and that picture doesn't prove a damned thing.
>> >
>> >It proves that the Christian Right can make scary propaganda.
>>
>>
>> And your response (and that of the person you respond to) proves that
>> homosexuals will Lie, Deny and do every thing possible to Suppress the
>> Truth about homosexuality. Even when there is photographic evidence.
>
>Any NAMBLA dude could waltz around with his sign/banner "next to" any
>group of people, and get his picture taken. Would that "photographic
>evidence" be grounds for an automatic judgment that the people he was
>standing next to at the time of the picture are people who are also
>pedophiles?
Catholic Priest
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 |
|