Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: "bobandcaroleUTB" <bobandcaroleUTB@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.prettyboy
Subject: Re: Now kidwell is hated in the science groups......
Date: 9 May 2006 07:26:58 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 83
Message-ID: <1147184818.279296.218310@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>
References: <1147183319.588018.62610@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com>
<1147184600.798860.322930@j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 152.163.100.131
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1147184827 11201 127.0.0.1 (9 May 2006 14:27:07 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 14:27:07 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <1147184600.798860.322930@j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/0.2
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; AOL 7.0; Windows NT 5.1),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
X-HTTP-Via: HTTP/1.1 Turboweb [rtc-te123 8.4.0], HTTP/1.0 cache-rtc-ac02.proxy.aol.com[98A36483] (Traffic-Server/6.1.0 [uScM])
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com; posting-host=152.163.100.131;
posting-account=dSwNRA0AAACkUAsApJQQKYwelkN7fRzw
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.prettyboy:1112
bobandcaroleUTB wrote:
> bobandcarole wrote:
> > View previous topic :: View next topic
> > Author Message
> > Ed Conrad
> >
> >
> > <
> > <
> > Jesus Christ wasn't even his name. Actually, it was
> > Jmmanuel (pronounced Immanuel).
> > <
> > And he NEVER once claimed to be the Son of God.
> > <
> > He informed his trusted apostles that his father was an
> > extraterrestrial, concerned about the future of mankind.
> > <
> > And he didn't die on the cross.
> > <
> > In fact, he lived to be about 90 years old.
> > <
> > The gospels of Matthew -- especially -- but also Mark,
> > Luke and John were doctored and heavily edited to conceal
> > the truth, to make him a God which he insisted he wasn't.
> > <
> > These distortions -- there are many other things as well --
> > were well done because their writings were accepted as
> > gospel for many centuries. But, finally, truth has caught up
> > to them..
> > <
> > But what they wrote, and didn't write -- twisting the facts, or
> > having the church hierarchy doing it -- amounts to nothing
> > more than deceit, deception, collusion and conspiracy.
> > <
> > I honestly think Matthew, Mark, Luke and John were innocent
> > victims and the alterations were ordered by the bigwigs of
> > the early church, promoting their own agenda.
> > <
> > In any event, instead of reading your prayer books on Easter
> > Sunday, do yourself a favor and spend some time reading
> > what's on Jim Deardorff's web page:
> > <
> > =======================
===============
> > <
> >
> >
> > Savant
> >
> >
> > Well, you are half right. Jesus never did claim to be the son of God,
> > that was others calling him that after his death on the cross, which is
> >
> > a historical fact, though the TIMING of the Crucifixion is a topic for
> > debate.
> >
> > We have no idea whether a regular person, connected by some fluke of
> > chance with the powers of the Universe and the ability to control those
> >
> > powers, would be able to do the SAME things that Jesus supposedly did.
> >
> > There is even debate on whether Jesus DID some of the miraculous things
> >
> > that he was rumored to have done (walking on water, raising the dead),
> > because there are other scientific explanations for those actions.
> >
> > For the walking on water, one scientist said that he could have been
> > walking on a sheet of ice in a dense fog. Plausible, considering that
> > one biblical account tells of Jesus "coming out of the mist, walking on
> >
> > the water".
> >
> > For the raising the dead, it could have been that the person who was
> > supposedly 'dead', that little girl, had been in a DEEP sleep or coma,
> > and Jesus just happened to come along and gave her a jump start to her
> > failing body with his powers, helping her body to overcome the disease
> > that was ravaging it. Plausible, though I will admit there is no way to
> >
> > prove it right or not, until we have the ability to travel through
> > time.
|
|