Re: Lust |
EasyNews, UseNet made Ea .. |
Go||um (nopie@dopie.sir) |
2005/11/17 19:16 |
On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 17:34:50 -0800, ++TedAlan++
<budgetyellowsnow@cdc.gov.notreally> wrote:
>In article <8mron1tfgtpujudlgdhfjq8vcqdnvn1s26@4ax.com>, boys@rough
>wrote:
>
>> P.S. These are the views of God and not of my own.
>
>You are as much a blasphemer as you are an idiot.
>
>Human beings, whether ultimately created by an intelligent designer or
>not, crave sex because they are genetically designed to do so.
>
>The rounded shapes of the buttocks and breasts, pressed together to form
>the illusion of a line down the center between them (cleavage), form an
>image that is known as a primal archetype, or icon. This image, as well
>as that of flushed red cheeks of the face, full pressed lips, large,
>round eyes placed a certain distance apart in proportion to the size of
>the skull, and indeed flaring large nostrils to an extent in some, form
>the basis of most sexual attraction at the most fundamental level.
>
>These features are present on the bossom and buttocks of a woman and the
>full, rounded buttocks of boys and girls who have residual baby fat or
>who have exercised their "glutes" through dance or gymnastics.
>
>The phallus is also rounded at the end and has a cleft along the bottom
>of the glans which is also aesthetically pleasing the to eye. Even the
>most hetero of men can appreciate the image of his own penis.
>
>The puritanical, patriarchal rants of Jewish sheep herders from 2000+
>years ago as they struggled to eek out a nomadic existence while
>transmigrating the ancient deserts of the Middle East are no basis for a
>modern, just, ethical society. They had no time for juries and trials.
>They had no scholars who were able to provide counsel for the defense of
>someone accused of adultery, witchcraft, murder, etc. They dispatched
>one another with great prejudice and acrimony while they fleet-footed
>about looking for people to trade cattle, trinkets and daughters with.
>
>God did not write your bible. Men did. Extremely flawed men with
>serious sexual hang-ups. The days when waving a book around and getting
>everyone to agree that it's God's word are dead and gone.
>
>None of this is to say that there can be no morality, no civility, and
>no ethics. Indeed, it is one of the great challenges of our time to
>arrive at some kind of general, multicultural consensus on the moral and
>ethical basis of our legal system.
>
>Only through understanding the reasons why we "lust" for others can we
>come to grips with it and control it. No one should victimize another
>for the sake of fulfilling their personal fantasies. Neither should
>anyone deprive another of sexual pleasure based on their outdated,
>unreasonable, neurotic hang-ups about sex and its purpose. That too, is
>a perversion. That too, is sexual abuse.
Nice work Ted.
It's too bad you called him an idiot. I doubt he will be very
receptive after reading that first sentence.
-g
|
Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
|
|